Psychepedia

Banding Techniques: Enhancing Your Workflow Efficiency

In today’s fast-paced work environment, maximizing efficiency is crucial for success. One powerful yet often overlooked strategy is the implementation of banding techniques. These methods not only streamline various tasks but also foster collaboration and organization within teams. By grouping related activities and resources, banding allows professionals to minimize distractions, reduce redundancy, and focus on what truly matters. In this article, we will explore various banding techniques and how they can significantly enhance your workflow efficiency, leading to improved productivity and better outcomes in your projects.

Banding refers to the procedure of grouping test scores into ranges and treating scores within a particular range as equivalent when making personnel decisions. After an organization collects test scores from candidates who applied for a job, a hiring decision must be made using these scores. There are a number of approaches for making these decisions. One common strategy is called top-down selection: Candidate scores are ranked from highest to lowest and organizations start at the top of the list by selecting the candidate with the highest score, then move to the person with the next highest score, and so on down the list. Another common strategy is the practice of setting cutoff scores. A cutoff score involves setting a passing score where candidates at or above this score are labeled as passing the test, whereas those below are labeled as failing. With a cutoff score those passing are treated as if they performed equally on the test. Banding is an alternative to top-down and cutoff score approaches.

Banding involves creating a defined range within which candidate scores are treated as being the same. This is similar to grouping scores into grades as done in many academic settings (e.g., a score between 90% and 100% is considered an A, a score between 80% and 89% is considered a B, etc.). The concept of banding is based on the idea that small differences between test scores may not translate into meaningful differences in expected job performance. For example, a candidate who scores 94% on a test may not perform noticeably better on the job than a candidate who scores 92%. This is because tests are not perfectly predictive of job performance and have varying degrees of measurement error. Banding is the idea of taking into account this imprecision by creating ranges within which test scores are treated as being the same. Thus for candidates who have scores that fall within the same band, the difference between their scores is viewed as meaningless in terms of predicting meaningful differences in job performance, and therefore the candidates are treated as if they scored equivalently on the test.

Purpose of Banding

One key question is, Why would an organization create bands within which candidate scores are considered equivalent? Critics have argued that banding results in a loss of information and has a negative impact on the utility or usefulness of a test. They state that a top-down approach has the highest utility. In response others have noted that although banding may in some circumstances result in a loss of economic utility, this loss may be negligible and must be weighed against other compelling reasons for banding such as the need to increase workforce diversity.

Banding was first proposed as a method for reducing the adverse impact against protected groups (e.g., minorities, women) that is often associated with a top-down approach to selection test decision making. This is because Whites, on average, tend to outperform certain minorities on commonly used written multiple-choice selection tests measuring factors such as cognitive ability and job knowledge. Given this situation, Whites will be chosen at a substantially higher rate in comparison to members of these minority groups if a strict top-down rank order approach is used. Banding was suggested as a viable strategy for addressing this problem. Banding can reduce adverse impact because a band includes lower-scoring as well as higher-scoring individuals; thus when selection decisions are made regarding whom to choose from a band, other factors such as diversity can be taken into account. That is, if candidates that fall within a band are considered equal, an organization may consider the minority group membership of candidates when deciding whom to hire from a given band rather than just selecting the individual with the highest score. Banding allows an organization the flexibility to consider other factors such as diversity when making hiring decisions, whereas a top-down approach does not.

Creating Bands

Many different methods exist for developing bands. For example, expert or managerial judgments could be used to determine what range of scores on a test should be considered equivalent. Another viable approach is to use historical data on how candidates in the past performed on the test and subsequently on the job to determine what bands should be formed. An additional, yet controversial, method for creating bands is the concept of using indicators test reliability as a basis for creating bands. This approach uses statistical significance testing to determine what size the band should be so that test scores that fall within a band are not considered statistically different.

The most common version of this approach leverages a statistic known as the standard error of the difference (SED) to create bands. This SED procedure specifies a range of test scores that will be treated as statistically indistinguishable at some accepted level of confidence. That is, the bandwidth is a function of the standard error of measurement of the test and the desired level of confidence that scores within a band are not statistically different. This approach leverages the psychometric properties of the test in terms of its reliability to determine proper bandwidth. Critics of this approach state that the logic behind it is fatally flawed and that carrying it out to its conclusion would lead to random selection (i.e., selecting individuals completely at random rather than based on their test scores). However, proponents of this approach note that because selection tests are not perfectly reliable, the degree of unreliability should be taken into account when interpreting test scores. They further state that using indicators of unreliability is a more objective and appropriate way to create bands than doing so based on purely arbitrary decisions or solely relying on expert judgments.

Types of Bands

Bands can be either fixed or sliding. Fixed bands use the top score as the starting point, and the first band consists of all scores that fit within the range of the top score minus the bandwidth. For example, if the top score on a test was 96.0 and the bandwidth based on the SED approach was 5.2, the first band would range from 96.0 to 90.8. All scores that fell within this range would be considered part of band one and they would be treated as if they were equivalent. The second band would be the next highest score after band one minus the bandwidth. Therefore, for the example given earlier, the second band would range from 90.7 to 85.5. Additional bands would be created in a similar manner. With a fixed band approach, all individuals within a given band must be selected prior to moving to the next band. That is, band one needs to be completely exhausted before moving to band two.

Sliding bands also use the top score as an initial starting point, and the band is equal to this starting point minus the bandwidth. However, the difference with sliding bands is that when the top score is selected, a new band is formed using the next highest existing score in the band as the starting point. That is, when a top score in a band is chosen, the band slides down and is established using the next highest score as its anchor point. Using the previous example where the top score was 96.0 and the bandwidth was 5.2, individuals would be chosen from within this band until the top score is chosen, at which time the band

would slide down to be anchored on the next highest score. Thus if the individual with a score of 96.0 was chosen and the next highest score was 94.0, the new band would be set at 94.0 minus the bandwidth of 5.2 (i.e., a range of 94.0 to 88.8). Furthermore, when the current high score of 94.0 is chosen, the band would slide again and anchor on the next highest remaining score. The sliding band allows an organization to consider more people more quickly by moving down the rank order list more rapidly. Unlike with fixed bands, sliding bands do not require that a band be exhausted before moving down the list. Instead, when a top score is chosen, the band slides down and allows the organization to consider new individuals for selection.

Effectiveness and Legality of Banding

Research has shown that depending on varying circumstances, such as bandwidth size, banding can be used to reduce adverse impact. An organization can use banding procedures to group scores and then give preference to certain groups when selecting from a band as a means of increasing the diversity of its workforce. Opponents of banding note the loss in utility from not using a top-down approach, but proponents have responded by stating that the possible loss in economic utility is not substantial. One other key issue is whether banding is a legal practice. Most agree that although banding is legal, choosing individuals from a band based on protected group status (e.g., race, gender) could be problematic. The Civil Rights Act prohibits considering factors such as race and gender when making hiring decisions. Although this issue has not been fully resolved, recent court rulings have upheld the use of different types of banding. However, a review of these cases indicates that when protected group status is the only factor used to make choices from a band, it is less likely to be acceptable to the courts than when it is only one of many factors that are used.

References:

  1. Aguinis, H. (2004). Test-score banding in human resource selection: Technical, legal, and societal issues. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.
  2. Campion, M. A., Outtz, J. L., Zedeck, S., Schmidt, F. L., Kehoe, J. F., Murphy, K. R., et al. (2001). The controversy over score banding in personnel selection: Answers to 10 key questions. Personnel Psychology, 54, 149-185.
  3. Cascio, W. F., Outtz, J. L., Zedeck, S., & Goldstein I. L. (1991). Statistical implications of six methods of test score use in personnel selection. Human Performance, 4, 233-264.
  4. Henle, C. A. (2004). Case review of the legal status of banding. Human Performance, 17,415-432.

See also:

Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging: Insights into Healthy Aging and Longevity

The Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging (BLSA) has been a cornerstone in the field of gerontology since its inception in 1958. As one of the longest-running studies of its kind, the BLSA has meticulously tracked the health, behaviors, and life experiences of thousands of participants over the decades. This comprehensive research endeavor has yielded invaluable insights into the biological, psychological, and social aspects of aging, shedding light on what it means to age healthily and enhance longevity. By examining the diverse factors that contribute to successful aging, the BLSA continues to inform not only scientific understanding but also public health initiatives aimed at promoting well-being in later life. In this article, we delve into the key findings of the study and explore how they can guide individuals and communities towards healthier aging trajectories.

The Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging (BLSA) is a major clinical research program in human aging conducted in Baltimore by the National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health (NIA, NIH). The events that started the BLSA have become almost a  legend  in  the  research  field  of  aging.  In  1958, Dr. William W. Peter, an officer of the U.S. Public Health Service, decided to bequeath his body to science. An inquiry to NIH yielded the suggestion that he consult Dr. Nathan Shock, who at that time was leading a group of NIH scientists interested in understanding “the biological factors that produce what we perceive as aging” and “the mechanisms that produce impaired performance with age.” Dr. Shock had become convinced of the need to study community-dwelling people over time, that is, “longitudinally.” Thus, when Dr. Peter placed a phone call to Dr. Shock to find out how he could arrange to donate his cadaver for scientific study, Dr. Shock replied, “Let’s have it when you are still alive!” The two scientists met and the BLSA came into existence. Over the subsequent near half-century, the scientific knowledge generated from the BLSA has become so vast that the study is universally considered the most comprehensive study on aging in human subjects ever attempted.

The BLSA study population consists of a series of healthy volunteers of different ages followed indefinitely with serial evaluations over time. A consortium of scientists collects and analyzes data from this study population with the aim of characterizing normal and pathological aging. Thus, the BLSA can be envisioned as a series of nested longitudinal and cross-sectional studies oriented toward (1) describing the anatomical, physiological, and functional changes that occur over the aging process, independent of diseases; (2) identifying the biological, behavioral, and environmental factors that account for these changes; (3) studying factors that predict healthy aging; and (4) developing hypotheses concerning possible targets for interventions that may positively affect several aspects of the aging process and prevent age-related pathology.

In just under 50 years of operation, and with approximately 3,000 participants enrolled and more than 800 manuscripts published in peer-reviewed journals, the BLSA has generated most of the current knowledge of the aging process in humans. Perhaps the BLSA’s most important contribution involves disentangling the effect of disease and illness from the aging process and the development of the notion that aging is distinct from disease. Accordingly, most of the initial BLSA analyses were dedicated to describing changes in physiology and behaviors that are caused by aging per se, independent of disease. The BLSA portfolio includes original discoveries in the physiology and pathophysiology of the cardiovascular system, diabetes, diet and energy metabolism, age-associated modification of and risk factors for changes in cognition and personality, early predictors of prostate cancer, specific patterns of decline in sensory function, age-associated changes in body composition, decline in kidney function, secular trends in physical activity, and dietary intake. These domains represent a small sample of the wealth of information that the BLSA has provided.

In 2002, the BLSA underwent a major change in its design and objectives. Over the previous decade, the fields of genetics and molecular biology have made tremendous steps forward in the understanding of cell biology. Some of the traditional questions concerning the aging process had to be revisited and, to some extent, even reformulated. For example, the plausibility of a clear distinction between aging and disease had come under question. Thus, building on previous experience, the BLSA in 2002 entered into a new stage where its focus was on mechanisms that, over the aging process, lead to the condition of “frailty” conceptualized as increased susceptibility to disease and  reduced  ability  to  sustain  stress. Additionally, frailty is believed to involve multiple physiological systems, including those important for mobility and cognitive function. It is hypothesized that over time, frail older persons show parallel, accelerated declines in anatomical integrity and function in multiple physiological systems, while individuals that develop specific diseases show, at least initially, clinical features that suggest selective and localized organ or physiological system damage. In accordance with this view, frailty is considered to contribute to fluctuation and instability of health status, high risk of multiple negative health-related outcomes and exhaustion of functional reserve. It is also hypothesized that (1) the destabilizing impact of acute medical events or traumas in older individuals is higher in frail than in nonfrail individuals; (2) early stages of frailty may be detected only by tests that challenge functional reserve  and  compensatory  ability;  and  (3)  frailty stems from dysfunction of some core mechanism that maintains integrity and function at a cellular level.

The paradigm used in the BLSA to study age-related frailty covers three basic levels of measurement: (1) mobility and physical function and cognitive capacity; (2) anatomical integrity and functionality of the physiological systems important for mobility, including the central nervous system, the peripheral nervous system, the muscular-skeletal system, the energy production and delivery system, and the sensory system; (3) physiological signaling systems important at the whole organism level for maintaining biological homeostasis, including energy production and delivery. These features include dietary intake, physical exercise, and immunology, with particular focus on inflammatory markers, autonomic nervous system, and oxidative stress/antioxidants. All of these measures are included in the BLSA core, in order to study their concurrent and longitudinal relationships and understand how changes in these parameters affect aging, age-related diseases and the development of frailty, loss of physiological reserve, and functional decline.

References:

Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging, http://www.grc.nia.nih.gov/branches/blsa/blsa.htm

Balanced Scorecard: A Comprehensive Approach to Strategic Performance Management

In today’s dynamic business environment, organizations are constantly challenged to align their strategies with performance metrics that drive success. The Balanced Scorecard, developed by Robert Kaplan and David Norton, offers a holistic framework that goes beyond traditional financial measures, integrating diverse perspectives such as customer satisfaction, internal processes, and organizational learning. This comprehensive approach allows businesses to translate their vision and strategy into actionable objectives, fostering continuous improvement and sustainable growth. In this article, we will explore the key components of the Balanced Scorecard and discuss how it can enhance strategic performance management in various organizational contexts.

Balanced scorecard is a management system that enables organizations to translate vision and strategy into action. This system provides feedback on internal business processes and external outcomes to continually improve organizational performance and results. Robert Kaplan and David Norton created the balanced scorecard approach in the early 1990s.

Most traditional management systems focus on the financial performance of an organization. According to those who support the balanced scorecard, the financial approach is unbalanced and has major limitations:

  • Financial data typically reflect an organization’s past performance. Therefore, they may not accurately represent the current state of the organization or what is likely to happen to the organization in the future.
  • It is not uncommon for the current market value of an organization to exceed the market value of its assets. There are financial ratios that reflect the value of a company’s assets relative to its market value. The difference between the market value of an organization and the current market value of the organization’s assets is often referred to as intangible assets. Traditional financial measures do not cover these intangible assets.

The balanced scorecard suggests that organizations should be viewed and measured from four different perspectives. These perspectives are as follows:

  • The business process perspective—the internal business processes that are often classified as mission oriented and support oriented. Examples of this perspective include the length of time spent prospecting and the amount of rework required.
  • The customer perspective—the level of customer focus and customer satisfaction. Examples of this perspective include the amount of time spent on customer calls and customer survey data.
  • The financial perspective—the financial aspects of the organization. Examples of this perspective include financial ratios and various cash flow measures.
  • The learning and growth perspective—includes employee training and organizational attitudes related to both employee and organizational improvement. Examples of this perspective include the amount of revenue that comes from new ideas and measures of the types and length of time spent training staff.

Using the balanced scorecard, companies create their own unique measures of these four aspects of the business. The specific measures that a company develops should reflect the specific drivers and strategy of the business.

Kaplan and Norton recommend a nine-step process for creating and implementing the balanced scorecard in an organization.

  1. Perform an overall organizational assessment.
  2. Identify strategic themes.
  3. Define perspectives and strategic objectives.
  4. Develop a strategy map.
  5. Drive performance metrics.
  6. Refine and prioritize strategic initiatives.
  7. Automate and communicate.
  8. Implement the balanced scorecard throughout the organization.
  9. Collect data, evaluate, and revise.

There are many benefits and challenges to the balanced scorecard. The primary benefit is that it helps organizations translate strategy into action. By defining and communicating performance metrics related to the overall strategy of the company, the balanced scorecard makes the strategy come alive. It also enables employees at all levels of the organization to focus on important business drivers.

The main challenge of this system is that it can be difficult and time-consuming to implement. Kaplan and Norton originally estimated that it would take an organization a little more than 2 years to fully implement the system throughout the organization. Some organizations implement in less time and some require more time. The bottom line is that the balanced score-card requires a sustained, long-term commitment at all levels in the organization for it to be effective.

References:

  1. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1993, September). Putting the balanced scorecard to work. Harvard Business Review, 71, 134-147.
  2. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996, January). Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system. Harvard Business Review, 74, 75-85.
  3. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2000, September). Having trouble with your strategy? Then map it. Harvard Business Review, 78, 167-176.
  4. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2004, February). Measuring the strategic readiness of intangible assets. Harvard Business Review, 82, 52-63.
  5. Niven, P. R. (2002). Balanced scorecard step-by-step: Maximizing performance and maintaining results. New York: Wiley.
  6. Ulrich, D., Zenger, J., &Smallwood, N. (1999). Results-based leadership. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

See also:

Balance Theory: Understanding the Dynamics of Interpersonal Relationships

Interpersonal relationships are intricate webs of emotions, beliefs, and interactions that shape our social lives. At the heart of these connections lies Balance Theory, a psychological framework that offers insights into how individuals strive for harmony in their relationships. Developed by social psychologist Fritz Heider, Balance Theory posits that people naturally seek consistency in their feelings and opinions about themselves, others, and the attitudes that bind them together. This article delves into the fundamental principles of Balance Theory, exploring how it influences our relationships, the importance of cognitive consistency, and the dynamics that emerge when balance is disrupted. Understanding these dynamics not only enhances our emotional intelligence but also equips us with the tools to navigate the complexities of our social interactions.

Balance Theory Definition

Balance theory describes the structure of people’s opinions about other individuals and objects as well as the perceived relation between them. The central notion of balance theory is that certain structures between individuals and objects are balanced, whereas other structures are imbalanced, and that balanced structures are generally preferred over imbalanced structures. Specifically, balance theory claims that unbalanced structures are associated with an uncomfortable feeling of negative affect, and that this negative feeling leads people to strive for balanced structures and to avoid imbalanced structures. An example for a balanced structure is when your best friend also likes your favorite rock band; an example for an imbalanced structure is when your best friend dislikes your favorite rock band. According to balance theory, the first case makes you feel good, whereas the second case creates an uncomfortable tension.

Theoretical Assumptions

The original formulation of balance theory was designed to describe the pattern of relations between three individuals. Such relation patterns between three objects or individuals are often referred to as “triadic” relations. From a general perspective, a triadic relation between three individuals includes (a) the relation between a first person A and a second person O, (b) the relation between the second person O and a third person X, and (c) the relation between the first person A and the third person X (also described as A-O-X triad). In addition, it is assumed that the specific relations between two individuals can be positive (i.e., the two individuals like each other) or negative (i.e., the two individuals dislike each other). According to balance theory, a triad is balanced when it includes either no or an even number of negative relations. In contrast, a triad is imbalanced when it includes an odd number of negative relations. For example, the resulting triad of relations between Peter, John, and Paul would be balanced if (a) Peter likes John, John likes Paul, and Peter likes Paul; (b) Peter likes John, John dislikes Paul, and Peter dislikes Paul; (c) Peter dislikes John, John likes Paul, and Peter dislikes Paul; or (d) Peter dislikes John, John dislikes Paul, and Peter likes Paul. However, the resulting triad would be imbalanced if (a) Peter dislikes John, John likes Paul, and Peter likes Paul; (b) Peter likes John, John dislikes Paul, and Peter likes Paul; (c) Peter likes John, John likes Paul, and Peter dislikes Paul; or (d) Peter dislikes John, John dislikes Paul, and Peter dislikes Paul.

Even though balance theory was originally developed to explain patterns of interpersonal relations, it has also been applied to study attitudes and opinions about objects. For example, a triad including Sarah, Alice, and country music would be balanced if Sarah likes Alice, Alice likes country music, and Sarah also likes country music. However, the resulting triad would be imbalanced if Sarah likes Alice, Alice likes country music, but Sarah dislikes country music.

Over and above these assumptions for personal sentiments, balance theory assumes that a positive relation can also result from the perception that two objects or individuals somehow belong together. Conversely, a negative relation can result from the perception that two objects or individuals do not belong together. Such kinds of relations are typically called “unit relations.” Positive unit relations can result from any kind of closeness, similarity, or proximity, such as membership in the same soccer team, similar hair style, or same ethnic background. In contrast, negative unit relations can result from distance, dissimilarity, or distinctness, such as membership in different soccer teams, different hair style, or different ethnic background.

Evidence

The distinction between balanced and imbalanced triads has been shown to have important implications for a variety of different domains. First, research has shown that the uncomfortable feeling associated with imbalanced patterns influences the formation of new attitudes. Specifically, it has been demonstrated that newly formed attitudes usually complete triadic relations in a manner such that the resulting triad is balanced rather than imbalanced. For example, if Sarah learns that a yet unknown individual is liked by her friend Alice, Sarah will form a positive attitude toward this individual. However, if Sarah learns that the same individual is disliked by her friend Alice, Sarah will form a negative attitude toward this individual.

Second, research has demonstrated a general superiority in memory for balanced as compared to imbalanced information. For instance, people show higher accuracy in recalling balanced patterns such as “Peter likes John, John dislikes Paul, and Peter dislikes Paul.” However, people show lower accuracy in recalling imbalanced patterns such as “Peter likes John, John dislikes Paul, and Peter likes Paul.” This difference in memory performance is even more pronounced when the triad includes the perceiver (e.g., “I like John, John dislikes Paul, and I dislike Paul”).

Third, balance principles have been shown to have important implications for people’s identity and the way people feel about themselves. Research in this area has shown that mental associations between the self and a particular group, evaluations of this group, and personal evaluations of oneself typically show patterns that can be described as balanced rather than imbalanced. For instance, if a Black person has a strong mental association between the self and the category Black, and in addition shows a positive evaluation of the cate-gory Black, this person will also exhibit a positive self-evaluation (i.e., “I’m Black, Black is good, therefore I’m good”). However, if a Black person has a strong mental association between the self and the category Black, but shows a negative evaluation of the category Black, this person will likely exhibit a negative self-evaluation (i.e., “I’m Black, Black is bad, therefore I’m bad”). According to balance theory, this transfer of evaluations is due to the inherent “unit” between the self and the category Black.

References:

  1. Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.
  2. Insko, C. A. (1984). Balance theory, the Jordan paradigm, and the Wiest tetrahedron. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 18, pp. 89-140). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Bail-Setting Decisions: Understanding the Impact on the Justice System

Bail-setting decisions play a crucial role in the American justice system, influencing not only the lives of the accused but also the broader societal landscape. As courts grapple with balancing the presumption of innocence against public safety and the potential flight risk of defendants, the complexities of these decisions become increasingly apparent. This article delves into the implications of bail-setting practices, exploring how they affect individual rights, community safety, and systemic equity. With an eye on recent reforms and ongoing debates, we aim to shed light on the vital interplay between bail decisions and the quest for a fair and just legal process.

The bail-setting decision is one of the early court decisions made in a case, and it has attracted attention from researchers studying legal decision making. When a case is adjourned (postponed), the court must decide what to do with the defendant until the next hearing of the case—basically, should the defendant be released on bail or not? The main goal of the bail decision is to ensure that the defendant appears at court for the next hearing. The bail decision also can affect later decisions in a case. Although laws govern the bail decision-making process, they are typically vague and ill defined, thus allowing courts considerable discretion. Past research on bail decision making has mostly been conducted in the United States and the United Kingdom; researchers have aimed to describe how courts make bail decisions as well as to evaluate efforts to improve bail decision making.

Because it arises each time a case is adjourned for trial, sentence, or appeal, the bail decision is one of the most frequent legal decisions made by the criminal courts. The primary goal is to ensure that the defendant surrenders to the court at the next hearing of the case and so does not abscond. A secondary goal is that the defendant does not threaten community safety (e.g., offend) while released on bail. In the United States, the court sets a monetary amount of bail. A defendant may either be required to provide a security (deposit the amount with the court) before release, which is forfeited if he or she fails to appear in court, or be released on recognizance, which is a promise to appear, so the amount is paid only if he or she fails to appear. (For a fee, bail bondsmen can act as a surety, a third party who agrees to pay the forfeited amount to the court.) Nonfinancial conditions, such as curfew and surrendering firearms, may also be applied to bail. In the United Kingdom, defendants can be bailed (released) unconditionally; bailed with nonfinancial conditions or financial conditions, such as surety or security; or denied bail and remanded into custody. Whereas in the United States the bail decision is commonly measured on a continuous scale reflecting the monetary amount at which bail is set, in the United Kingdom the decision is typically measured as categorical because financial bail is uncommon. In most jurisdictions, bail jumping (skipping bail or absconding) is an offense.

The bail decision-making process is often governed by legislation, which is periodically revised. For instance, in the United States, currently there is the Federal Bail Reform Act of 1984 (state laws vary); in the United Kingdom, there is the Bail Act of 1976. It has often been recommended that the practice of bail decision making should adhere to the principles of due process rather than crime control. Thus, there is typically a general right to bail or pretrial liberty. However, there are exceptions if the court decides that the defendant may pose a risk of absconding or offending. The laws typically recommend that the court considers several factors (e.g., the defendant’s offense, community ties, previous convictions, prior bail record, and strength of the prosecution’s case) when judging these risks and consequently making bail decisions. Beyond this, the court is afforded considerable latitude in making bail decisions in terms of how it weights and integrates these and other factors.

The bail decision can have significant negative ramifications for defendants and their families if a defendant is denied bail or cannot raise the bail amount. For instance, defendants may lose their homes, employment, contact with their families, and their reputations, as well as experience the adverse effects of custody. In addition, evidence suggests that the bail decision may influence later decisions on a case, such as the decision to plea, convict, and sentence. Here, defendants who do not get bail are more likely to plead guilty or be convicted and are also more likely to receive a custodial sentence than their bailed counterparts.

Much of the past research, as noted previously, has investigated bail decision making in the United States and the United Kingdom. Studies have been conducted by psychologists, sociologists, criminologists, and legal scholars using methodologies such as experiments involving decision makers being presented with simulated cases, interview and questionnaire surveys of decision makers, courtroom observations of bail hearings, analyses of bail records and statistics, and analyses of bail laws. While most of this body of research has aimed to describe and explain how bail decisions are made, several studies have explored efforts to improve bail decision making. Overall, the research has yielded consistent findings.

Describing and Explaining Bail Decisions

Researchers have aimed to describe and explain bail decisions in terms of the variations in decision making and the factors that influence bail decisions. Studies have documented the variation in bail decisions made across cases and across jurisdictions (courts or decision makers), as well as within jurisdictions (courts or decision makers). There are apparent disparities in how cases that vary in their extralegal characteristics, such as the defendant’s gender and race, are dealt with. In addition, different jurisdictions (courts or decision makers) may disagree on how to deal with cases that are similar. Beyond this, there is variability where the same jurisdiction (court or decision maker) is inconsistent in dealing with similar cases on different occasions.

Research has shown that bail decisions may be influenced by both legal and extralegal factors. Legal factors include the nature and seriousness of the offense the defendant is charged with, the defendant’s previous convictions, and the strength of his or her community ties. Specifically, bail is more likely to be denied or set at a high amount if the defendant is charged with a serious offense, has previous convictions, or has weak community ties. The extralegal factors that have been found to affect bail decisions include the defendant’s gender and race and the police and prosecution’s recommendations. Here, denial of bail or its high amount is more likely to be associated with the defendant being male or non-White and a recommendation to deny bail.

In addition to identifying the factors that may influence bail decision making, some psychological studies have examined how the information is processed to form a decision. Here, there is evidence to suggest that the bail decision is the result of a simple strategy where only a few factors are considered rather than a more complex strategy involving weighting and integration of several factors.

Improving Bail Decisions

Researchers and policymakers have attempted to improve bail decision making by reducing discretion and increasing the availability of relevant information. As mentioned, the law affords the court considerable discretion in how it makes bail decisions. There have been attempts to reduce variability in bail decisions and the influence of extralegal factors as well as increase the accountability, transparency, and equity of bail decisions by limiting this discretion through the introduction of more precise guidelines. For example, in the United States, bail guidelines that specify the factors that the court should use and how they should make their risk assessments have been developed and implemented in several jurisdictions since the early 1980s. John Goldkamp and colleagues have evaluated the utility of such guidelines using randomized controlled trials and pre-post analyses. They found that decisions made under guidelines differed from those made without guidelines in several respects, including that under guidelines the bail amount was lower, there was an increase in the use of nonfinancial conditions, and there was a reduction in the time in pretrial custody. However, the impact of guidelines appears to differ across jurisdictions as they are applied and used differently.

There have also been efforts to increase the effectiveness of bail decisions by improving the court’s ability to judge the defendant’s risk of absconding on bail. The idea is that low-risk defendants, such as those who have strong ties to the community and thus may be unlikely to abscond, can be appropriately released. For example, in the United States, the Manhattan Bail Project (later renamed the New York Release on Recognizances Project) involved the collection, verification, and scoring of information on a defendant’s community ties (e.g., residence, employment, and family situation) and then providing a recommendation directly to the court concerning the defendant’s suitability for bail. In a randomized controlled trial involving real cases, the Vera Institute of Justice in 1963 found that defendants in the experimental group for whom a recommendation was provided were more likely to be bailed than those in the control group for whom the recommendation was withheld. In the United Kingdom, Bail Information Schemes provide largely positive information about a defendant’s community ties to the prosecution and defense, who then can relay it to the court. In 2002, in an experiment involving simulated cases, the author found, however, that such schemes did not have a statistically significant effect on the bail decisions made.

References:

  1. Dhami, M. K. (2002). Do bail information schemes really affect bail decisions? Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 41, 245-262.
  2. Dhami, M. K. (2005). From discretion to disagreement: Explaining disparities in judges’ pretrial decisions. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 23, 367-386.
  3. Dhami, M. K., & Ayton, P. (2001). Bailing and jailing the fast and frugal way. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 14, 141-168.
  4. Goldkamp, J. S., & Gottfredson, M. R. (1985). Policy guidelines for bail: An experiment in court reform.Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
  5. Goldkamp, J. S., Gottfredson, M. R., Jones, P. R., & Weiland, D. (1995). Personal liberty and community safety. Pretrial release in the criminal court. New York: Plenum Press.

Return to the overview of Trial Consulting in Forensic Psychology.

Bad Is Stronger Than Good: Exploring the Influence of Negativity

In a world where positivity is often celebrated and sought after, the pervasive presence of negativity proves to be an even more powerful force shaping our thoughts, behaviors, and societies. From the age-old adage that “bad news travels fast” to research suggesting that negative experiences have a more profound impact on our psychology than positive ones, the influence of negativity is undeniable. This article delves into the complexities of our emotional landscape, examining how adverse experiences, criticisms, and challenges can overshadow the uplifting moments in our lives and why understanding this dynamic is crucial for personal growth and social progress. By exploring the strength of bad in our everyday interactions, we aim to illuminate the crucial lessons hidden within our darker experiences and how they ultimately guide us toward a deeper understanding of ourselves and the world around us.

Bad Is Stronger Than Good Definition

Bad is stronger than good refers to the phenomenon that the psychological effects of bad things outweigh those of the good ones. Bad usually refers to situations that have unpleasant, negative, harmful, or undesirable outcomes for people, while good usually refers to situations that have pleasant, positive, beneficial, or desirable outcomes for people. Bad things have stronger effects than good things for virtually all dimensions of people’s lives, including their thoughts, their feelings, their behavior, and their relationships. Few topics in social psychology have approached the generality and validity of bad is stronger than good across such a broad range of human behavior.

Context and Importance of Bad Is Stronger Than Good

The bad is stronger than good phenomenon is at the heart of a centuries-old debate, namely, the relative importance of good and bad forces in the struggle of humankind. History is replete with stories on gods and devils fighting to get the upper hand on humanity. In everyday life, people are confronted with a continuous battle between what is good and what is bad. These battles may concern important issues, for example, behaving altruistically, such as by missing an important interview to help a friend, versus behaving selfishly, such as by refusing to help a friend to attend the interview that may double one’s salary. They may also concern mundane issues, such as eating a healthy meal versus devouring a meal at one’s favorite junk food restaurant, staying sober versus drinking a glass of beer, or studying for one’s exam versus going out with one’s friends. Reflecting its importance in people’s lives, almost everybody, even little children, know the difference between what is good and what is bad.

What form does this eternal struggle take in social psychology? Ample research in social psychology provides evidence showing that bad is stronger than good. That is, negative events have a greater impact on us than positive events. For example, people are more distressed by the loss of $50 than they are made happy by finding $50. This does not necessarily mean that bad will triumph over good. Some researchers suggest that good may prevail over bad by outnumbering it. To illustrate, within good, lasting relationships, friends and intimate partners have approximately five good interactions for each negative interaction. Thus, many good interactions can override the negative effects of one bad interaction. Given equal numbers of good and bad, however, the effects of bad ones are generally stronger than those of the good ones.

The most recognized reason that bad is stronger than good is evolutionary. Organisms that are attuned to preventing bad things are suggested to flourish and thrive more than those oriented primarily toward maximizing good things. A person who ignores the danger of fire may not live to see the next day. A person who ignores the pleasures of a fun night out may lose nothing but that, a fun night out. People’s survival and well-being thus seem to require more urgent attention to avoiding bad outcomes than to approaching good outcomes.

A broad variety of evidence confirms the relative strength of bad over good. Probably the strongest evidence is provided by research on relationships. Initially, it was argued that human beings have a fundamental need to belong, their central task and goal in life being to sustain a network of close, positive, and long-lasting relationships. As it turned out, however, the need to belong does not concern a need for positive interactions as much as a need for non-negative interactions. A closer look at the evidence from relationship research does indeed suggest that the harmful effects of bad relationship characteristics outweigh the beneficial effects of good characteristics of relationships. Typically, in studies on relationships, couples are videotaped for about 15 minutes during which they talk about various topics such as their marital problems or how their day went. Couples’ verbal and nonverbal behavior during these interactions is registered and coded as positive or negative.

Reflecting the principle that bad is stronger than good, the findings generally show that the presence or absence of negative behaviors is more strongly related to the quality of a relationship than the presence or absence of positive behaviors. Thus, increasing positive behaviors will affect the relationship less strongly than decreasing the negative behaviors. This has been found in longitudinal studies, daily interactions among spouses, parents, and parents and children. Thus, based on bad is stronger than good, advice for good relationships is not “do the good things” but “do not do the bad things.”

Overall the evidence is clear and consistent that bad is stronger than good within relationships. However, bad is stronger than good is not just a relational phenomenon, but reflects a general principle among a broad range of psychological phenomena. For instance, research on how people form impressions of others has found that negative information receives more attention, is processed more thoroughly, and contributes more strongly to an impression than does positive information. Similarly, in the language of emotions and emotion-related words, there is consistent evidence that humans have many more (one-and-a-half times more) words for negative emotions than for positive emotions. With respect to self-esteem, perceptions of rejections appear to be much more important to people’s self-esteem and sense of worth than perceptions of acceptance. Research on affective forecasting shows that people overestimate the enduring impact of negative events much more than they overestimate the effect of positive events. As a final example, threatening faces in a crowd are more rapidly detected than are smiling faces.

Reference:

  • Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5, 323-370.

Babyfaceness: The Secret to Youthful Charm and Appeal

In a world where youthfulness is often celebrated and pursued, the concept of “babyfaceness” has emerged as a fascinating phenomenon that captures the essence of charm and appeal. This intriguing trait, characterized by features often associated with infants—such as round faces, wide eyes, and soft skin—holds a magnetic quality that transcends age. As we explore the psychology and biology behind this alluring attribute, we’ll discover how babyfaceness influences perceptions of attractiveness, fosters social connections, and even impacts personal and professional opportunities. Join us as we delve into the secret behind this captivating quality and its timeless allure.

Babyfaceness Definition

Babyfaceness refers to a configuration of facial qualities that differentiates babies from adults. A baby’s head is characterized by a large cranium with a perpendicular forehead and small lower face with a receding chin. Compared with adults, babies also have relatively large eyes, full cheeks, fine eyebrows, and a “pug” nose. Although the appearance of babies defines babyish facial qualities, babyfaceness is not synonymous with age. At every age level, including infancy and older adulthood, some individuals are more babyfaced than others. Thus, a more babyfaced adult could be younger or older than one who is more mature-faced.

More babyfaced individuals share certain features with babies, such as rounder faces, larger eyes, smaller noses, higher foreheads, and smaller chins. There are babyfaced and mature-faced individuals of both sexes, although women’s facial anatomy tends to resemble that of babies more than men’s does. Babyfaced individuals also are found among people of all racial backgrounds, which is consistent with the fact that the differences in facial appearance between babies and adults are similar for all humans. Indeed, there are even some similarities across species.

Context and Importance of Babyfaceness

Recognizing babies and responding appropriately to them has had great evolutionary importance. Those who didn’t do so were certainly less likely to have passed their genes on to the next generation. Thus we have evolved a ready recognition of babies’ distinctive appearance qualities that generalizes to people of all ages who resemble babies. There is high agreement in perceiving some adults as more “babyfaced” than others. Moreover, people can recognize babyish facial features in a racially unfamiliar person just as well as in someone from their own group. The ability to identify babyfaced individuals develops at an early age. Not only can infants differentiate babies from older individuals, but also they discriminate between baby-faced and mature-faced people of the same age by showing a preference for looking at the more baby-faced person. Young children are able to show their keen sensitivity to variations in babyfaceness with words. When shown two photographs of young adults and asked which one looks “most like a baby,” children as young as 3 years old tended to choose the same face that college students judged as the more babyfaced of the two.

Individuals who resemble babies experience effects far more significant than just being labeled babyfaced. Just as babies deter aggression and elicit warm, affectionate, and protective responses, babyfaced individuals of all ages elicit unique social interactions. These derive from the tendency to perceive them as having more childlike traits, including naivete, submissiveness, physical weakness, warmth, and honesty.

A sense that babyfaced individuals should be protected from those who are more mature-faced is revealed in the finding that more babyfaced plaintiffs in small claims court are awarded more compensation from mature-faced than babyfaced perpetrators. Other evidence of stronger protective responses to babyfaced individuals is provided by the finding that people who find a lost letter with a resume enclosed are more likely to return it when the photo on the resume shows a babyfaced than a mature-faced person. A sense that babyfaced individuals are naive is revealed in the finding that adults speak more slowly when teaching a game to babyfaced 4-year-olds than when teaching the same game to more mature-faced 4-year-olds and in the finding that adults assign less cognitively demanding chores to babyfaced than mature-faced 11-year-olds. The perception that babyfaced individuals are submissive is revealed in the finding that they are less likely to be recommended for jobs requiring leadership than are equally qualified mature-faced job applicants. On the other hand, those who are more babyfaced are more likely to be recommended for jobs requiring warmth. A job applicant’s babyfaceness made as much of a difference in job recommendations as the applicant’s sex, and the actual jobs that people held were influenced as much by their babyfaceness as by their personality traits, further demonstrating the power of babyfaceness to influence social outcomes.

The perception of babyfaced individuals as more honest and naive than their mature-faced peers has significant consequences for their judged culpability when accused of wrongdoing. Adults perceive the misbehavior of babyfaced children as less intentional than the same misdeeds by mature-faced children of the same age. Similarly, babyfaced adults are less likely to be convicted of intentional crimes than their mature-faced peers. In contrast, babyfaced adults are more likely to be convicted of negligent crimes, consistent with stereotyped perceptions of their naivete. These effects have been found not only in laboratory experiments but also in actual trials in small claims courts. Interestingly, when babyfaced adults or children admit committing intentional wrongdoing, they are punished more severely than the mature-faced, whereas they are punished less severely for acknowledged negligent acts. It seems that others react more harshly to people’s negative behavior when their appearance makes that behavior very unexpected.

One might wonder whether babyfaced individuals actually have the traits that others expect. Although others’ expectations may sometimes elicit confirming behavior from babyfaced individuals in a particular social interaction, evidence suggests that babyfaced people do not reliably show the expected traits. Indeed, there are documented differences between babyfaced and mature-faced people that are opposite to the stereotypes. More babyfaced young men tend to be more highly educated, contrary to impressions of their naivete, more assertive and likely to earn military awards, contrary to impressions of their submissiveness and weakness, and more likely to be juvenile delinquents when they come from a high risk population, contrary to impressions of their honesty. Although these differences are small, they still call for an explanation. One possibility is that babyfaced young men try so hard to refute others’ stereotypes of them that they overcompensate.

References:

  1. Montepare, J. M., & Zebrowitz, L. A. (1998). Person perception comes of age: The salience and significance of age in social judgments. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 30, pp. 93-163). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  2. Zebrowitz, L. A. (1997). Reading faces: Window to the soul? Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

Baby Talk: The Science Behind How Infants Communicate

From the moment they enter the world, babies utilize an array of sounds and expressions to communicate their needs and emotions, laying the groundwork for future language development. This form of communication, often referred to as “baby talk,” is more than just adorable coos and gurgles; it encompasses a complex interplay of instincts and social cues. In this article, we delve into the fascinating science behind how infants express themselves, exploring the developmental milestones of early communication, the role of caregivers, and the broader implications for language acquisition. Join us as we uncover the intricacies of how the tiniest members of our society convey their thoughts and feelings long before they can form words.

Babies learn to speak by listening to their caretakers. People help them by modulating the sounds of speech in fundamentally the same way. A topic of much speculation among researchers who study language acquisition is the observation that caretakers consistently address their infants in this unique tone and manner of voice, a form that has come to be known as “baby talk,” “infant-directed speech,” or motherese. Motherese is a linguistic register based on exaggeration of pronunciation and simplification of syntax. It is found in virtually every culture and has certain common characteristics: The sentences are very short, there is a lot of repetition and redundancy, there is a sing-song quality to it, and it contains many diminutive words. It is also embedded in the context of the immediate surroundings, with constant reference to things and goings-on nearby. Certainly there is a social component to this form of speech. Infants respond more positively and listen longer to infant-directed than to adult-directed speech. Furthermore, while researchers disagree over whether exposure to this type of speech is necessary for successful first language acquisition, there is general agreement that motherese contributes to the ease with which infants are able to break into their particular language of exposure.

For the language-learning infant, identifying the components that make up spoken language is a difficult task. Instances of words vary phonetically and acoustically, depending on the discursive, syntactic, and phonological contexts in which they occur. This is in addition to variations introduced by changes in, for example, talker identity and speaker affect. At the earliest stages, word recognition must be guided by features of the individual instances of words themselves. Although it remains unclear precisely which aspects of the auditory signal initiate recognition, acoustic prominence—an important characteristic of infantdirected speech—is one factor that has been considered particularly influential in jump-starting this process. Data supporting this view indicate that infants generally prefer to listen to acoustically salient speech, where “salient” can mean either effectively or emphatically so. Conveniently, the natural form of input to the language-learning child is modified in just such a way.

Infants face another difficulty when it comes to speech segmentation. In fluent speech, words are not separated by pauses, and the cues that may serve to signal word boundaries vary from language to language. Nevertheless, and despite these challenges, normally developing infants begin to succeed at recognizing words in fluent speech about midway through their first year. This has been attributed, in large part, to caretakers’ tendency to repeat content words when addressing their infants. Repetition of the full form of a word is perfectly reasonable—even expected—in speech directed to infants, and this repetition is quite distinct from the reduction to pronominal form that occurs across mentions of content words in adultdirected speech. Although repetition is often cited as one of many characteristics of speech directed to infants, it is generally viewed as subordinate to the prosodic quality of such speech. While repetition appears to be an important feature in guiding speech segmentation, it is not the aspect of motherese that is most often referred to as influential in language learning. However, given the problems the language learner faces, it may well be just as important as other aspects of this unique register.

Generally speaking, infant-directed speech involves clear and careful pronunciation, exaggerated intonation, relatively few abstract words, reference to tangible objects that a child can see and touch, and a focus on the actions the child is doing or witnessing. Not  only  mothers  speak  motherese. Anybody  who communicates with young children will adopt this modified form of speech. And while it is arguably not fundamental to a child’s ability to acquire language, its apparent universality points to its importance in aiding that process.

References:

  1. Ferguson, A. (1964). Baby talk in six languages. American Anthropologist, 66, 103–114.
  2. Fernald, , Taeschner, T., Dunn, J., Papousek, M., BoyssonBardies, B., & Fukui, I. (1989). A cross-language study of prosodic modifications in mothers’ and fathers’ speech to preverbal  infants.  Journal  of  Child  Language,  16, 477–501.
  3. Jusczyk, P.  (1997).  The  discovery  of  spoken  language. Cambridge: MIT
  4. Morgan, J. L., & Demuth, K. D. (Eds.). (1996). Signal to syntax: Bootstrapping from speech to grammar in early language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ:

Understanding Baby Boomers: Insights into Their Values and Experiences

As the largest generational cohort in history, Baby Boomers have significantly shaped the social, economic, and cultural landscape of the world. Born between the mid-1940s and early 1960s, this generation experienced transformative events that influenced their perspectives and values, from the civil rights movement to the rise of technology. Understanding the Baby Boomers’ unique experiences and the principles they uphold can provide valuable insights into their preferences, challenges, and aspirations. This article delves into the core values and experiences that define Baby Boomers, exploring how these factors continue to resonate in today’s society.

Baby Boomers have had a tremendous impact on 20th century history and culture. Baby Boomers are defined  as  anyone  born  between  1946  and  1964. In the United States, nearly 30% of the population constitutes Boomers. The increased birthrate in the post–World War II era also impacted Canada, where the generation is known as “boomies.” In Britain, Baby Boomers are simply referred to as “the bulge.” Baby Boomers have left an indelible mark on the modern history of the United States.

Throughout the course of human history, the optimism or pessimism of a civilization can be measured by the birthrate. An increase in birthrate usually represents a more optimistic culture, whereas a decrease may indicate pessimism. For example, a declining birthrate contributed to the fall of the Roman Empire in 476 AD. In the modern era, a similar trend surfaced in France as the birthrate declined in the second half of the 20th century and pessimism reigned, while in the United States the rate of birth skyrocketed, signifying the rise of extreme optimism and the Baby Boomer generation. In 1940, there were about 2.5 million births in America, and by 1946 the number grew to 3.3 million births. The rate continued to rise in the United States from 1955 to 1964 as the birthrate continued to expand, and the rate never fell below 4.0 million each year.

There was good reason for optimism in the United States. Not only did the nation emerge from the Great Depression and World War II virtually unscathed, but the United States would also dominate global politics in an unprecedented fashion. In 1946, the United States constituted 6% of the world’s population, yet it controlled 63% of the world’s industry and 75% of the world’s capital. As the American economy continued to grow in the second half of the 20th century, the Boomers were uniquely positioned to contribute to the expansionism.

The outlook of the Baby Boomers was distinctly different from either of their two predecessors, the Greatest Generation (1900–1929) and the Eisenhower Generation (1930–1945). The postwar world represented tremendous hope and opportunity, and the Boomers sought to take full advantage. The generation experienced the hope and aspirations of the New Frontier  of  the  Kennedy Administration,  the  Civil Rights and Voting Rights acts, while they also encountered disillusionment in Vietnam and Watergate. The assassinations of John Kennedy, Martin Luther King, Jr., and Bobby Kennedy left a permanent mark on the usually optimistic generation. The culture, music, and attitudes of the nation were directly influenced by the Boomers. More than anything else, the group contributed sweeping changes to modern America.

The Baby Boomers were also better educated than earlier generations. This was due in large measure to the G.I. Bill. American servicemen used Franklin Roosevelt’s G.I. Bill to obtain college degrees, and this benefit was also extended to Boomers. The Boomer generation was about twice as likely as their parents to be high school or college graduates and nearly 25% of the postwar group earned bachelors’ or advanced degrees. The value of higher education continued as the children and grandchildren of Boomers headed to colleges and universities throughout the United States in unprecedented numbers.

Perhaps most striking of all was the impact that Baby Boomers had and continue to have on the national economy. The Boomers have the highest labor force participation of any generation in American history. Nearly 90% of the postwar generation  works—over  half  of  the  entire  workforce  in the nation. Nearly 80% of female Boomers worked, which opened the door for tremendous opportunities. The economic prosperity of the 1990s was due in large measure to Boomers reaching their peak in both earning and spending. Baby Boomers are also less apt to marry, more apt to divorce, and have fewer children than earlier generations.

Baby Boomers have had an enormous influence on modern America. The sudden population growth impacted the nation politically, culturally, and economically. Baby Boomers have left a significant mark on the history of the United States.

References:

  1. Collins, ,  &  Clinton,  T.  (1992).  Baby  Boomer  blues. New York: Word Publishing.
  2. Freedman, M. (2002). Prime time: How Baby Boomers will revolutionize retirement and transform America. Washington, DC: PublicAff
  3. Owram, (1997). Born at the right time: A history of the Baby Boomer generation. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
  4. Queenan, (2002). Balsamic dreams: A short but selfimportant history of the Baby Boomer generation. New York: Picador.

Babinski Reflex: Understanding Its Significance in Neurological Health

The Babinski reflex, named after the French neurologist Joseph Babinski, is a key indicator of neurological health, particularly in infants and individuals with certain neurological conditions. This reflex responses involve the upward movement of the big toe and fanning of the other toes when the sole of the foot is stroked. While commonly observed in infants as a normal developmental stage, the presence or absence of the Babinski reflex can provide critical insights into the functioning of the central nervous system across all ages. Understanding its significance not only aids in diagnosing various neurological disorders but also highlights the intricate connections between reflexes and overall brain health. In this article, we will delve into the mechanism of the Babinski reflex, its implications for neurological assessments, and what its variations can reveal about an individual’s well-being.

The Babinski reflex is also known as Babinski’s sign or hallucal dorsiflexion reflex, and was first described by Dr. Joseph Francois Felix Babinski (1857–1932), a French neurologist. The reflex is a neuromuscular one elicited by drawing a blunt point (such as a thumbnail or the end of the handle of a reflex hammer) along the outer sole of the foot from the heel to the metatarsal pads and then toward the great toe (hallux). This should be done with light pressure; a painful stimulus is incorrect. The normal (negative) response is downward extension of the great toe and often other toes, often with extension of the ankle. Abnormal (positive) responses include upward flexion of the great toe, fanning of the toes, upward flexion of the ankle, and flexion of the knee and hip. Some or all of these may be present. This is a superficial reflex, mediated by nerves from the fourth lumbar through the first or second sacral segments and involves activation of the tibial nerve. In the absence of tibial nerve palsy, a positive response indicates dysfunction of pyramidal tract motor neurons in the cortex and subcortex, brain stem, and spinal cord.

Babinski’s sign is one of a group of primitive reflexes, also known as infantile reflexes. These are present at birth but are normally suppressed by higher neural functions as growth and development proceed. The abnormal upgoing response of the toes or an absence of response may be seen in newborns and infants, but the normal response should emerge permanently by the age of 2 years. Other primitive reflexes include the snout reflex, sucking reflex, and grasp reflex, which, when seen in older children and adults, are indicative of significant cortical neurological dysfunction.

Abnormal  Babinski  responses  may  be  present in  meningitis,  head  or  spinal  cord  injury,  brain tumor,  spinal  tuberculosis  (Potts’ disease),  hepatic encephalopathy, stroke, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, multiple sclerosis, some forms of poliomyelitis, and other, less common diseases.

References:

  1. Mother & Child Glossary. (n.d.). Innate neonate capacities. Retrieved from  http://www.hon.ch/Dossier/MotherChild/postnatal/reflexes.html

Babbling: The Art of Expressive Communication

Babbling is often dismissed as mere baby talk, a stage in language development that adults overlook as children transition from coos to complex sentences. However, this seemingly simple act of vocalization is a profound example of expressive communication, laying the groundwork for effective interaction and emotional expression. As caregivers, educators, and communication enthusiasts delve into the nuances of babbling, they uncover the rich tapestry of sound, rhythm, and intentionality that characterize this formative stage. This article explores the significance of babbling, highlighting its role in communication development and the ways it can enhance our understanding of expressive behavior at all ages.

Babbling is the stage of language development during which children produce speech sounds arranged in nonsensical combinations, such as “bababa,” “deedeedee,” or “badegubu.” All normally developing children babble. Parents and family members may view babbling as an endearing but trivial behavior produced by infants; however, babbling represents a stage of language development during which the child is laying the foundation for future adult-like language production.

The Sounds Of Babbling

The first vocalizations produced by infants include crying, laughing, and cooing. When infants are between 2 and 3 months old, they begin to coo. Cooing infants produce sounds that most closely resemble the vowels a, e, and o. Cooing may be an extended single vowel as in “oooo” or “aaaa” or a complex series of vowels, “aaaeeeooo.” Babbling typically begins by the 6th month. Table 1 provides a summary of the types of utterances produced by the child in the first year.

Between the 6th and 7th months, infants gain greater control of jaw movements, enabling them to produce the vowels i and u and the consonants g and k.

Over time, infants begin producing the consonants m, n, p, b, and d. During this time, infants engage in vocal play. They may produce nonspeech sounds such as squealing, yelling, and growling. They may also produce raspberries, which are created when the tongue is extended through rounded lips and air is forced through the mouth.

Between 6 and 9 months, infants begin to combine a single consonant and vowel together in a long repetitive sequence, such as “bababababa” or “deedeedeedee.”  Such  sequences  are  characteristic of canonical babbling. Over time, infants’ babbling becomes more complex. Productions typically involve different syllables produced in the same utterance, as in “badegubu” or “deekidobu.” Such sequences are characteristic of variegated babbling. Between the ages of 12 and 14 months, infants’ babbling is likely to contain intonational contours or prosody. Infants may produce streams of speech sounds that have the melody of adult speech. It may sound as though the infant is making a statement or asking a question, even though they are not saying anything meaningful.

Development Of Babbling

Table  1    Types of Utterances  Produced  by a Child in the First Year

There are physical changes that occur in the young infant that make babbling possible. At birth, infants’ vocal structure closely resembles that of nonhuman primates, with a shorter vocal tract and a much higher larynx than adults. Before babbling can occur, the vocal tract must mature, and the infant’s larynx must descend from high in the nasal passage to a lower position in the throat. During the 3 months of life before the larynx descends, infants can eat and breathe simultaneously. Before the larynx descends, infants are incapable of producing complex speech sounds, such as syllables composed of consonant-vowel combinations. Infants are capable of producing cries, clicks, groans, and sighs. After the larynx descends, infants can produce cooing sounds, such as “ooo” and “aaa.” By the age of 4 months, the vocal tract more closely resembles that of adults, and babbling generally emerges. In the months following the descent of the larynx, infants’ vocalizations become more and more complex.

Research has shown that 95% of infants’ babbled vocalizations involve the 12 speech sounds that are most common across the world’s languages: m, d, j, p, h, b, w, t, n, k, g, and y. The vocalizations babbled by all infants are strikingly similar across the world, regardless of the infants’ native language. It is common for infants to produce speech sounds that are not among the speech sounds of their native language. For example, infants reared in English-speaking environments may produce

non-English speech sounds, such as the click sounds that occur in certain African languages. Likewise, infants reared in Japanese-speaking environments may produce speech sounds not occurring in Japanese, such as [r]. As infants mature, more of the speech sounds produced are those speech sounds heard in the environment in the language or languages of the home, and fewer of them are speech sounds from other languages. This phenomenon has been referred to as babbling drift.

When Babbling Is Delayed Or Does Not Occur

An absence or substantial delay of babbling may occur in infants born with certain medical conditions or infants with developmental disorders. For example, infants who have had a tracheotomy typically do not babble  and  show  persistent  abnormalities  in  their vocal patterns if their normal breathing is not restored by the second year of life.

Some infants may be unable to produce speech due to a disorder affecting the motor control system. This disorder is called apraxia. Infants with severe apraxia may not coo or babble and may fail to produce a first word. They may attempt to communicate by pointing and grunting. Less severe forms of apraxia may be characterized by a delay in the production of the first word. When words are produced, speech  sounds  that  are  difficult  to  articulate  may be consistently replaced with speech sounds that are easier to articulate.

Babbling may also be delayed or completely absent in infants affected by autism. Autism is a disorder characterized by abnormal social development. Autism is typically accompanied by delays in language development and may be accompanied by mental retardation. Those with the severest forms of autism may not speak at all. Those with mild forms of autism may produce some speech, but the amount of speech that is produced is far less than that of the typical infant.

Babbling may be delayed in infants born with Down syndrome, a chromosomal abnormality that causes mental retardation. Approximately 1 in 800 infants is born with Down syndrome each year. Down syndrome children typically experience delays in language development. Down syndrome infants start the canonical babbling stage 2 months later than other infants do. However, when babbling does occur, it is similar to the babbling produced by normally developing infants. Due to abnormalities in the development of the vocal tracts, palates, and tongues of Down syndrome children, speech production is likely to be challenging for the Down syndrome child.

Babbling occurs without a delay in infants born with hearing impairments. Each year, approximately 1 in 1,000 children is born with a severe hearing loss. The early vocalizations made by profoundly deaf infants cannot be easily distinguished from those made by hearing infants. Deaf infants will cry, coo, and begin to babble. However, deaf infants are unlikely to produce repeated consonant–vowel syllables characteristic of the canonical babbling stage. The amount of babbling and the quality of the babbling produced by deaf infants may be less than that produced by hearing infants. Deaf infants who are exposed to sign language from birth develop sign language skills in the same stages as hearing infants develop speech and listening skills. Signed languages  such  as  American  Sign  Language  (ASL) are  unique  languages,  each  having  its  own  rules of grammatical structure. Deaf infants who are exposed to a signed language will produce manual babbling—sequences of gestures that can be viewed as language practice. Manual babbling typically emerges around 10 months. In contrast, hearing infants who are exposed to a signed language during the first year of life produce very little manual babbling.

Summary

Babbling is a routine stage of language development, observed in all normally developing infants. Starting at the 6th month, infants practice the speech sounds that will later be used to form syllables, words, and sentences. Over time, the sequences that are babbled become more complex. By the end of the first year, infants have produced their first words. For infants with certain developmental disorders, babbling may be delayed or absent.

References:

  1. Hoff, E.  (2001).  Language  development.  Belmont,  CA: Wadsworth/Thomson
  2. Ritchie, W. , & Bhatia, T. K. (1999). Handbook of child language acquisition. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Understanding Behaviorism: The Legacy of B. F. Skinner

Behaviorism, a foundational theory in psychology, has profoundly shaped our understanding of human behavior and learning. At the forefront of this movement was B. F. Skinner, an influential psychologist whose work explored the mechanisms of reinforcement and conditioning. His experiments with animals and insights into behavior modification have left an indelible mark on both psychology and education. As we delve into Skinner’s legacy, we will examine the principles of behaviorism, the techniques he pioneered, and the criticisms that have emerged over the decades, providing a comprehensive overview of how his contributions continue to influence contemporary psychology and society at large.

Having made contributions that were as profound as they were practical, Burrhus Frederic (B. F.) Skinner was one of the most eminent psychologists of the 20th century. Born on March 20, 1904, in Susquehanna, Pennsylvania, he developed an early penchant for inventing and experimenting, was a keen observer of biology and behavior, and read Francis Bacon. With an emerging intellectual independence, he entered Hamilton College in 1922 as an English major, but he bristled at its social conventions and institutional constraints. Encouraged by Robert Frost, he began a career as a writer, but writing failed him in that it didn’t make a difference in Progressive, modernist America.

While he was writing, though, he was reading. Bertrand Russell was praising John B. Watson’s behaviorism and Sinclair Lewis was extolling life in science. The latter resonated with what Skinner had read in biology at Hamilton: Jacques Loeb’s insistence that experimentation was the foundation of knowledge. When Skinner sought advice about psychology, his professors directed him to Ivan P. Pavlov and Harvard University. After deciding on Harvard, he continued to read. Pavlov was demonstrating the importance of experimental control, H. G. Wells was promoting science over the humanities for understanding behavior, and Watson was promoting behaviorism in ways that appealed to Skinner’s growing iconoclasm.

The Shaping of a Behaviorist

Skinner arrived at Harvard in 1928 and found a psychology department more aligned with structuralist theories of mind than a science of behavior. He turned to William J. Crozier’s Department of General Physiology, which engaged Loeb’s science. With support from his colleague, Fred S. Keller, Skinner began several lines of research to demonstrate the lawfulness of behavior on which the environment acted—reflex behavior (e.g., food elicits salivation in dogs). This was Pavlov’s science. What emerged, though, were new apparatus (e.g., the Skinner box) and a preparation that revealed the lawfulness in behavior that acted on the environment—instrumental behavior (e.g., bar pressing by rats is reinforced by food). This science in which cause was unmediated functional relations, influenced by Ernst Mach, would be Skinner’s science.

Skinner received his Ph.D. in 1931, but remained at Harvard on fellowships, where he distinguished between respondent and operant behavior, and conducted research on the latter. He was influenced by Percy W. Bridgman, who taught him about operationalizing his terms, and by reading Charles S. Peirce, who inclined him toward hard-nosed philosophical pragmatism (e.g., truth as successful working). Skinner moved to the University of Minnesota as an instructor in 1936 and, that fall, married Yvonne (Eve) Blue from Flossmoor, Illinois. Their first child, Julie, was born in 1938, the same year he published The Behavior of Organisms. This seminal account of his experimental analysis of behavior is among his most important contributions to psychology and was the foundation of a new discipline—behavior analysis.

Style and Content of Science

In Skinner’s style of science, knowledge was based on description, prediction, and experimental control. Experimental control was established through the discovery and demonstration of functional relations between independent and dependent variables. The discovery and demonstration of these relations were the process and product of within-individual experimental analysis. Irreducible functional relations were science’s basic principles. And theory was their systematic integration. Skinner uniquely extended this style to behavior as a subject matter in its own right. The content of his science was the principles of operant behavior. In 1938, these included conditioning and extinction, primary and secondary reinforcement and punishment, response differentiation and induction, stimulus control and generalization, and motivating operations. These principles remain fundamental in psychology.

Extensions and Applications

From the beginning, Skinner saw that science could be extended beyond the basic principles to interpret everyday behavior and applied to behavior of societal importance. His first interpretation concerned verbal behavior, which resulted in 1957 in what he considered his most important book—Verbal Behavior. This work was later applied to communication training for children with autism. At Minnesota, he extended his research to behavioral genetics and conducted seminal research in behavioral pharmacology. He also engineered behavior, training a rat to pull a chain that released a marble the rat then dropped down a tube to produce food. This demonstrated the practical effectiveness of reinforcement, simulated symbolic behavior, and was a microcosm of a token economy. During World War II, he engaged in military research, training pigeons to guide simulated bombs to precise destinations. This inspired his students, Keller and Marian Breland, to apply his science to commercial animal training.

In the 1940s, Skinner turned to human behavior. He invented a “baby tender” (i.e., a raised, enclosed, mobile space for playing and sleeping, with a full front window and shade, air filter, heating and humidity controls, and a roll of sheets for the bedding) for Eve and their second child, Deborah (b. 1944), to make infant care easier and enhance his daughter’s well-being. Although it was a contribution to domestic engineering, Skinner conducted no experiments with it. He also wrote a novel, Walden Two, in which he described a community’s use of his science to improve its cultural practices (e.g., childrearing, education, labor, and environmental stewardship). The book was not intended to be a blueprint for particular practices, however, because Skinner believed that communities should take an empirical approach to discovering effective, acceptable practices. Experimentation was constant; practices were contingent.

In 1945, Skinner moved to Indiana University as a full professor and chairperson of the psychology department. By then, he had formulated a philosophy of his science—radical behaviorism: Psychology referred to behavioral functioning, both public and private, and nothing more. In addition, he criticized theories of human behavior based in folk psychology, not science; social sciences that established facts, not functional relations between them; and applied psychology that focused on correlations instead of experimentation.

A Matter of Consequences

Skinner returned to Harvard in 1948 and established a pigeon laboratory. His pigeon research resulted in his 1957 compendium with Charles Ferster, Schedules of Reinforcement. He published Science and Human Behavior in 1953, which provided interpretations of individual behavior (e.g., self-control and thinking), social interactions (e.g., aggression), and cultural practices (e.g., education and government), and described how to change them. This work provided a foundation for applications in behavior therapy and applied behavior analysis.

In the early 1950s, Skinner began two lines of research with collaborators that extended his science to education and psychiatric patients. Skinner invented teaching machines, created programmed instruction, and described classroom applications, which resulted in his 1968 book, The Technology of Teaching. He critiqued psychoanalysis and suggested how his science could be integrated with biological approaches to psychopathology. He also addressed ethical issues in the control of human behavior. In a debate with Carl Rogers, for instance, he argued that values do not mediate behavior—they specify rein-forcers; that choice was not free—it was lawful; and that the fear of control was impeding science-based applications. These issues engaged Skinner throughout the 1960s, and resulted in his controversial 1970 book, Beyond Freedom and Dignity, which made him a public intellectual.

Skinner retired from Harvard as a professor emeritus in 1974, the same year he published About Behaviorism, an overview of his system. He remained active, however. He integrated his science with biology; conducted simulation research on cognition; addressed utopian and philosophical implications of his science; and wrote about language and consciousness. He also offered advice about intellectual self-management in a 1983 book with M. E. Vaughan, Enjoy Old Age; contended with ethical issues in the use of punishment; criticized psychology’s mediational theories of mind; and addressed international conflict and peace.

Skinner died of leukemia on August 18, 1990, just after receiving the last of his many awards—the American Psychological Association’s first award for a Lifetime Contribution to Psychology. His contributions were unique. His philosophy of science came from science, not philosophy. His science was grounded in experimental control, not predictions from theory. His extensions took science beyond the basic principles and his interpretations were based on and constrained by those principles. His applications were demonstrations of experimental control in solving societal problems. These applications, in turn, strengthened the validity of his philosophy, science, extensions, and interpretations. Skinner was a systematic psychologist.

References:

  1. Bjork, D. W. (1993). B. F. Skinner: A life. New York: Basic Books.
  2. Ferster, C. B., & Skinner, B. F. (1957). Schedules of reinforcement. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
  3. Skinner, B. F. (1938). The behavior of organisms: An experimental analysis. New York: Appleton-Century.
  4. Skinner, B. F. (1948). Walden two. New York: Macmillan.
  5. Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: Macmillan.
  6. Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
  7. Skinner, B. F. (1968). The technology of teaching. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
  8. Skinner, B. F. (1971). Beyond freedom and dignity. New York: Knopf.
  9. Skinner, B. F. (1974). About behaviorism. New York: Knopf.
  10. Skinner, B. F. (1999). Cumulative record (definitive ed.; V. G. Lates & A. C. Catania, Eds.). Cambridge, MA: B. F. Skinner Foundation.
  11. Skinner, B. F., & Vaughan, M. E. (1983). Enjoy old age: A program of self management. New York: Norton.

See also:

  • History of Counseling
  • Counseling Psychology

Awe: Discovering the Power of Wonder in Our Everyday Lives

In a world often dominated by routine and the mundane, the feeling of awe can serve as a refreshing reminder of life’s beauty and complexity. This profound emotion, rooted in wonder and admiration, has the power to transform our everyday experiences, enhancing our understanding of ourselves and the world around us. From the grandeur of nature to the simple acts of kindness that often go unnoticed, embracing awe can lead to deeper connections, increased creativity, and a greater sense of purpose. In this article, we will explore the significance of awe, the science behind its effects, and practical ways to cultivate this powerful emotion in our daily lives. Through discovering the wonders that surround us, we can unlock a richer, more vibrant existence.

Awe Definition

Awe refers to an intense emotional response people may have when they encounter an object, event, or person that is extraordinary. Things that elicit awe are typically vast in size, significance, or both. Frequent elicitors of awe include nature, natural disasters, grand architecture and historical ruins, supernatural or spiritual experiences, scientific or technological marvels, childbirth, and being in the presence of powerful or celebrated individuals.

Awe involves some degree of surprise, disbelief, or disorientation as one strives to assimilate the presence of the extraordinary and make it conform to one’s expectations, prior experiences, and beliefs about what is possible. Quite often, awe results in the need to alter existing belief structures—sometimes in profound and life-changing ways—to accommodate the experience and its implications. This process of change and reorientation may take moments or days and can range in tone from pleasant to terrifying, depending on the situation and the individual’s personality.

The roots of the word awe lie in Germanic words for fear and terror, and early religious uses of awe almost always involve fear (as the result of interactions with the Divine). In modern times, however, the word awe is used most often to describe experiences that are positive.

Awe History and Context

Awe has long been associated with religious traditions, which typically emphasize the life-transforming aspects of awe. Numerous religious texts tell stories that center around a moment of awe in the transformation of an ordinary person into a saint, prophet, or hero (e.g., St. Paul in the New Testament, Arjuna in the Bhagavad Gita). Upon recovery from the experience, the awe-inspired individuals then go forth and spread word of it, often performing great deeds or miracles that induce awe (and awe-inspired changes) in those who witness or (more typically) hear about them. In modern times, a central moment of awe appears frequently in the religious conversion narratives analyzed by William James in The Varieties of Religious Experience. Indeed, the experience of awe is often so transformative that many people find it fitting to speak of having been “born again” into a new and more harmonious configuration of self.

Some 60 years after William James, Abraham Maslow made major contributions to the literature on awe. Maslow spent years analyzing people’s reports of their encounters with the extraordinary. Maslow used the term peak experience to refer to these moments of deep insight and awe, during which new perspectives are revealed to people. Maslow maintained that all humans are capable of having peak experiences, although some appear to be more prone to them than others. He referred to such people as Peakers (as opposed to non-Peakers) and speculated that they were likely to have greater well-being, deeper relationships, and more meaning in life—predictions that continue to be of great interest to contemporary research psychologists. Maslow also maintained that non-Peakers could learn to become more like Peakers.

Maslow compiled a list of 25 of the most common aftereffects of peak experiences. Included are lack of concern about the self, decreased materialism, feelings of overwhelming positivity (including feelings that the world is good and desirable), transcendence of dichotomies, and increased receptivity to change.

Awe in Contemporary Society and Psychological Research

Awe, and the pursuit of awe, is a major influence on contemporary culture and the world’s economies. People spend billions of dollars per year to visit exotic islands, sacred ruins, grand cathedrals, castles, and national parks. They climb mountains, ride in hot air balloons, sky dive, scuba dive, and take their wide-eyed children to Disney’s Magic Kingdom. One of the best illustrations of the relevance of awe to contemporary culture may be found in Hollywood. A content analysis of the top 100 highest-grossing movies of all time indicates that epic, awe-eliciting movies (such as Lord of the Rings or Star Wars) account for an inordinately high percentage of the top 50 (relative to the bottom 50). Awe is indeed a draw.

While the pursuit of awe has long been a popular pastime, empirical work on awe within the field of psychology is in its infancy. Most of what is known about awe comes from people’s retrospective reports of their experiences. Although such methods can add much to researchers’ knowledge of awe (as was the case with James’s and Maslow’s work), experiments that use random assignment and adequate control conditions are typically preferable. Several emotion theorists have justified the paucity of research on awe by arguing that awe is not a “basic” emotion and is therefore less worthy of attention than are other emotions. The term basic emotion refers to those six emotions (anger, disgust, fear, joy, sadness, and surprise) that have been shown to have a universal facial expression. Numerous emotions not determined to be basic (e.g., love, guilt, shame, and gratitude) have, however, received ample attention within the psychological literature.

One impediment to the experimental study of awe has been the difficulty of eliciting awe in a laboratory setting. Recent technological advances have, however, made such an undertaking more feasible. Research psychologists are currently using digital video, large screen televisions, vast environments, and virtual reality to begin to elicit awe in the lab and study it experimentally with random assignment and adequate control conditions.

Work has also begun to investigate individual differences in responsiveness to awe. A recent theoretical paper by Dacher Keltner and Jonathan Haidt proposes that individuals who are highly responsive to beauty, nature, and human excellence may also be more responsive to awe experiences and may be more likely to seek them. Like the people Maslow dubbed Peakers, those with higher responsiveness are expected to experience greater overall well-being and be more resilient to stress.

Compelling stories about the unique and powerful ability of awe to make people more malleable and receptive to change (both personal and societal) have been documented for millennia. It is only now, however, that research psychologists are beginning to catch up with thinkers in philosophy and religion in studying the emotion of awe.

References:

  1. James, W. (1963). The varieties of religious experience; a study in human nature. New Hyde Park, NY: University Books.
  2. Keltner, D., & Haidt, J. (2003). Approaching awe, a moral, spiritual, and aesthetic emotion. Cognition and Emotion, 17, 297-314.
  3. Maslow, A. H. (1970). Religions, values, and peak-experiences. New York: Penguin.

Aversive Racism: Understanding Its Impact on Society

In a society increasingly aware of the complex dynamics of race and racism, the concept of aversive racism has emerged as a critical area of study. Aversive racism refers to the subtle, often unconscious biases held by individuals who consciously endorse egalitarian values yet harbor negative feelings toward certain racial or ethnic groups. This article delves into the mechanisms of aversive racism, exploring its implications for interpersonal relationships, institutional practices, and societal structures. By unpacking these nuances, we can better understand how aversive racism perpetuates inequality and examine strategies for fostering genuine inclusivity and understanding within our communities.

Aversive Racism Definition

Aversive racism is a form of contemporary racism that, in contrast to the traditional form, operates unconsciously in subtle and indirect ways. Aversive racists regard themselves as nonprejudiced but, at the same time, harbor negative feelings and beliefs about members of minority groups. Aversive racism was originally hypothesized to characterize the attitudes of many well-educated and liberal Whites in the United States, toward Blacks, but the basic principles apply to the attitudes of members of dominant groups toward minority groups in other countries with strong contemporary egalitarian values but discriminatory histories or policies. Despite its subtle expression, aversive racism has resulted in significant and pernicious consequences, in many ways paralleling the effects of traditional, overt racism (e.g., in the restriction of economic opportunity).

Nature of the Attitudes

Like other forms of contemporary racism, such as symbolic and modern racism (which focus on people with conservative values), the aversive racism framework views contemporary racial attitudes as complex. A critical aspect of the aversive racism framework is the conflict between positive aspects of people’s conscious attitudes, involving the denial of personal prejudice, and underlying unconscious negative feelings toward, and beliefs about, particular minority groups. Because of current cultural values in the United States, most Whites have strong convictions concerning fairness, justice, and racial equality. However, because of a range of normal cognitive, motivational, and sociocultural processes that promote intergroup biases, most Whites also develop some negative feelings toward, or beliefs about, Blacks, of which they are unaware or which they try to dissociate from their non-prejudiced self-images. These processes include the spontaneous categorization of people as ingroup and outgroup members on the basis of race (and the associated cognitive biases), motivations for status for oneself and one’s group, and sociocultural processes that promote stereotypes and system-justifying ideologies. Consistent with the aversive racist framework, Whites’ conscious (explicit) and unconscious (implicit) attitudes are typically dissociated.

Subtle Bias

The aversive racism framework also identifies when discrimination against Blacks and other minority groups will or will not occur. Because aversive racists consciously endorse egalitarian values, they do not discriminate in situations with strong social norms, which would make discrimination obvious to others and to themselves. In these contexts, aversive racists are especially motivated to avoid feelings, beliefs, and behaviors that could be associated with racist intent. However, aversive racists also possess unconscious negative feelings and beliefs, and these feelings are typically expressed in subtle, indirect, and easily rationalized ways. Aversive racists discriminate in situations in which normative structure is weak or when they can justify or rationalize negative responses on the basis of factors other than race. Under these circumstances, aversive racists engage in behaviors that ultimately harm Blacks but in ways that perpetuate their nonprejudiced self-image. In addition, aversive racism often involves more positive reactions to Whites than to Blacks, reflecting a pro-ingroup rather than an anti-outgroup orientation, thereby avoiding the stigma of overt bigotry and protecting a nonprejudiced self-image.

Evidence in support of the aversive racism framework comes from a range of paradigms, including studies of helping behavior, selection decisions, juridic judgments, and interracial interaction. For example, in personnel or college admission selection decisions, Whites do not discriminate on the basis of race when candidates have very strong or weak qualifications. Nevertheless, they do discriminate against Blacks when the candidates have moderate qualifications and the appropriate decision is therefore more ambiguous. In these circumstances, aversive racists weigh the positive qualities of White applicants and the negative qualities of Black applicants more heavily in their evaluations, which provide justification for their decisions. In interracial interactions, Whites’ overt behaviors (e.g., verbal behavior) primarily reflect their expressed, explicit favorable racial attitudes, whereas their more spontaneous and less-controllable behaviors (e.g., their nonverbal behaviors) are related to their implicit, generally more negative, unconscious attitudes.

Combating Aversive Racism

Traditional prejudice-reduction techniques have been concerned with changing old-fashioned racism and obvious expressions of bias. However, traditional techniques that emphasize the immorality of prejudice are not effective for combating aversive racism; aversive racists recognize that prejudice is bad, but they do not recognize that they are prejudiced.

Nevertheless, aversive racism can be addressed with techniques aimed at its roots at both individual and collective levels. At the individual level, strategies to combat aversive racism can be directed at unconscious attitudes, for example, with extensive training to create new, counterstereotypic associations with Blacks. In addition, because aversive racists consciously desire to be egalitarian, inducing aversive racists to become aware of their unconscious negative attitudes motivates them to try to inhibit their bias in both thoughts and action.

At the intergroup level, interventions may be targeted at changing the ways people categorize others. One such approach, the common ingroup identity model, proposes that if members of different groups (e.g., Whites and Blacks) think of themselves in terms of shared group identities (e.g., as Americans), inter-group attitudes will improve. Under these circumstances, pro-ingroup biases will be redirected to others formerly seen as outgroup members thereby producing more positive feelings toward them and reducing inter-group bias. Many of the conditions outlined by the contact hypothesis and other anti-bias interventions reduce bias, at least in part, by creating a sense of a common ingroup identity.

Summary

Although aversive racism is expressed in indirect and easily rationalized ways, it operates to systematically restrict opportunities for Blacks and members of other traditionally underrepresented groups, contributes to miscommunication between groups, and fosters a climate of interracial distrust. Understanding the nature of aversive racism can help contribute to policies that inhibit its effects (e.g., by focusing responsibility on decision makers) and help identify new techniques for eliminating unconscious bias.

References:

  1. Dovidio, J. F., & Gaertner, S. L. (2004). Aversive racism. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 36, pp. 1-51). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  2. Gaertner, S. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (1986). The aversive form of racism. In J. F. Dovidio & S. L. Gaertner (Eds.), Prejudice, discrimination, and racism (pp. 61-89). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
  3. Gaertner, S. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (2000). Reducing intergroup bias: The common ingroup identity model. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.

4.         Kovel, J. (1970). White racism: A psychohistory. New York: Pantheon.

Average Life Expectancy: Understanding the Factors that Influence Our Lifespan

Life expectancy is a crucial metric that reflects the average number of years a person can expect to live, serving as a barometer for public health and societal well-being. However, this figure is not solely determined by genetics; it is shaped by a complex interplay of factors including lifestyle choices, access to healthcare, socioeconomic status, environmental conditions, and even cultural influences. Understanding the myriad elements that contribute to life expectancy can empower individuals and communities to make informed decisions that promote longer, healthier lives. In this article, we delve into the various influences on lifespan, highlighting key statistics and emerging trends that reveal the changing landscape of longevity.

Life expectancy is the average number of years remaining to an individual of a specified age if the mortality conditions implied by a particular period (cross-sectional) or cohort (longitudinal) life table applied; the former projects the years remaining to all people of a given age, and the latter projects years remaining to all people born in a given year. Life expectancy is widely used as an indicator of mortality conditions because it is based on the mortality experience at all ages and is independent of age structure.

The conventional demographic notation used for life expectancy is ex, which denotes the remaining expectation of life at age x. For example, e0, e50, and e85  refer to the average number of years remaining to people 0 (newborn), 50, and 85 years of age, respectively. Life expectancy at birth (e0) is the most widely used value, so that where life expectancy is referred to without qualification, the value at birth is normally assumed. High levels of infant mortality may mean that those who survive this high-risk year may have higher life expectancies than the newborns themselves. The inverse of life expectancy at birth (1/e0) gives the per capita death rate in a population. For example, the 80-year life expectancy at birth of contemporary U.S. females implies a per capita annual death rate of 0.0125 (1/80).

The increase in life expectancy can be illustrated by data for women in the United States as given in Table 1, which shows the range of life expectancies at birth as well as at middle and old age over a single century in the United States.

Women enjoy life expectancies 2 to 10 years longer than men in most countries, the difference of which is referred to as the life expectancy gender gap. The life expectancy at birth in less developed countries (e.g., Kenya, India) generally is lower than in developed countries (e.g., Japan, Germany, the United States), as shown in Table 2. Japanese women currently experience the highest life expectancy of either sex for any country in the world.

Life expectancy at age 65 is important in the context of social security (Table 3) because it gives the average number of years the average individual will be expected to collect (unreduced) retirement benefits. For example, men attaining 65 in 2000 can expect to live 16.2 years, compared with 12.7 years in 1940. Thus, the increase in time that men can anticipate receiving social security in 2000 relative to 1940 is 3.5 years.

Table 3    Life Expectancy (Years) at Age 65 in the United States

Whereas life expectancy at birth is a life-table measure that refers to the average number of years remaining to a newborn or the average age of death in the cohort, median survival refers to the ages at which half of all deaths have occurred, and the mode of survival refers to the age corresponding to the highest frequency of deaths. For example, the mean, median, and modal ages of death for newborn U.S. females in 2000 were 80, 83, and 88 years, respectively. In every population on record, the mode of the length of life is several years higher than the mean, which is pulled down by premature (early) deaths. An additional concept that is important to understand for context is life span, defined in both empirical and theoretical contexts, the former as the “record age” of a species (122.5 years in humans) and the latter as the “hypothetical upper age limit of a species under a specified set of conditions.”

References:

  1. Berkeley  Mortality   Database,   http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/lifehtm
  2. Carey, R. (2003). Longevity: The biology and demography of life span. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  3. Guillot, M. (2003). Life tables. In P. Demeny & G. McNicoll (Eds.), Encyclopedia of population (V 1, pp. 594–602). New York: The Gale Group.
  4. Preston, S.  ,  Heuveline,  P.,  &  Guillot,  M.  (2001).Demography:   Measuring   and   modeling   population processes. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
  5. Social Security  Administration,  http://www.ssa.gov/history/lifeehtml
  6. S. National  Center  for  Health  Statistics,  http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/lifexpec.htm

Availability Heuristic: Understanding How Our Minds Influence Decision-Making

In a world inundated with information, our minds often rely on mental shortcuts to navigate complex decisions. One such shortcut, known as the availability heuristic, plays a pivotal role in shaping our perceptions and judgments. This cognitive bias leads us to overestimate the importance of information that is readily accessible or memorable, which can significantly influence our decision-making processes. By exploring the mechanisms behind the availability heuristic, we can gain valuable insights into how our thoughts are formed and how this bias impacts our everyday choices, from trivial matters to life-altering decisions. Understanding this phenomenon is crucial for enhancing our critical thinking skills and making more informed decisions in a data-driven age.

Availability Heuristic Definition

The availability heuristic describes a mental strategy in which people judge probability, frequency, or extremity based on the ease with which and the amount of information that can be brought to mind. For example, people may judge easily imaginable risks such as terrorist attacks or airplane crashes as more likely than the less easily imaginable (but objectively more likely) risks of influenza or automobile accidents.

Context, Consequences, and Causes of Availability Heuristic

Availability was one of three judgmental heuristics (or mental shortcuts), along with representativeness and anchoring and adjustment, that Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman hypothesized people adopt to simplify complex judgments. Because information about events that are more likely, frequent, or extreme is typically more available than information about events that are less likely, frequent, or extreme, the availability heuristic typically yields accurate judgments. However, the heuristic can also produce biased and erroneous judgments—as illustrated by people’s perception that terrorist bombings are more risky than influenza—because cognitive availability can be influenced by factors, such as media coverage or vividness, that are unrelated to probability, frequency, or extremity.

Researchers believe that the availability heuristic is partly responsible for several judgmental biases. People who live together, for instance, tend to claim too much responsibility for collaborative efforts such as washing dishes and starting arguments, partly because it is easier for people to think about their own contributions than to think about their cohabitants’ contributions. People also overestimate the magnitude of the correlation between clinical diagnoses (e.g., depression) and invalid diagnostic tests (e.g., drawing a frowning face), because diagnoses and tests that go together are more available than unrelated diagnoses and tests.

Researchers distinguish between two aspects of availability: the amount of information retrieved (e.g., the number of terrorist bombings) and the subjective experience of retrieving information (e.g., the perceived ease with which people can remember terrorist bombings). The amount of information retrieved and the experience of retrieving information often are confounded; that is, information that is more plentifully retrieved is also more easily retrieved. In a series of experiments, Norbert Schwarz and colleagues demonstrated that the experience of retrieving information influences judgments independent of—and sometimes in spite of—the amount of information retrieved. In one experiment, participants were asked to list either three or nine examples of chronic diseases. Participants who listed three examples judged chronic diseases to be more prevalent than those who listed nine examples because listing three examples is easier than listing nine examples even though three is less than nine.

References:

  1. Schwarz, N., & Vaughn, L. A. (2002). The availability heuristic revisited: Ease of recall and content of recall as distinct sources of information. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 103-119). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  2. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 207-232.

Autonomy-Supportive Coaching: Empowering Individuals to Thrive

In a fast-paced world where the pressure to perform often overshadows personal growth, the role of autonomy-supportive coaching has emerged as a transformative approach to personal and professional development. This coaching style focuses on fostering independence and self-determination, allowing individuals to harness their intrinsic motivation and unlock their full potential. By prioritizing autonomy, coaches empower their clients to take ownership of their journeys, leading to enhanced resilience, creativity, and overall well-being. This article delves into the principles of autonomy-supportive coaching and explores how it can create a nurturing environment for individuals to thrive.

Motivation is one of the foundations of successful sport performance, and coaches play a critical role in developing or undermining this attribute in their athletes.  The  techniques  coaches  use  to  instruct and motivate their athletes can influence whether athletes learn and achieve at a high level, develop a  strong  sense  of  confidence,  enjoy  their  experience, and persist in their sport over a long period of time.

Self-Determination Theory

In  1985,  Edward  Deci  and  Richard  Ryan  wrote their  influential  book,  Intrinsic  Motivation  and Self-Determination  in  Human  Behavior.  In  this text, and numerous subsequent publications, Deci and Ryan outlined their theory of human motivation, self-determination theory. This theory, often known as SDT, has guided much research examining  the  influence  that  coaches  can  have  on  their athletes’  motivation  and  subsequent  outcomes  in sport.

Deci and Ryan suggested that motivation is multidimensional, meaning that a person can be simultaneously motivated by multiple factors. Central to SDT is the distinction between self-determined and controlled forms of motivation. To be self-determined means to act with a sense of self-direction and choice. An athlete who is self-determined participates because that  athlete  finds  sport  enjoyable  or  interesting (intrinsic motivation) or values the benefits of sport participation. In contrast, motivation that is fueled by pressure from others or pressure from within (guilt) is  referred  to  as  controlled  motivation.  A  growing body  of  research  has  provided  evidence  regarding the benefits of being involved in sport for more self-determined reasons. For example, athletes whose participation is driven largely by self-determined factors as opposed to controlled forces perform at a higher level;  experience  more  positive  emotions;  use  positive coping strategies in stressful situations; and invest higher levels of concentration, persistence, and effort than athletes with lower self-determined motivation and stronger controlled motivation. In comparison, athletes with high levels of controlled motivation tend to experience a variety of negative outcomes such as drop-out  from  sport,  burnout,  antisocial  behavior, anxiety, and negative affect.

Given our understanding of the effects of controlled  and  self-determined  types  of  motivation on the athlete sport experience, a natural question that  arises  is:  How  do  athletes’  self-determined and  controlled  motivations  develop?  According to  SDT,  self-determined  motivation  is  most  likely to  develop  when  three  basic  psychological  needs, known as autonomy, competence, and relatedness, are fulfilled. Autonomy represents the need to feel personal  control  over  one’s  actions.  Competence reflects the need to feel effective. Relatedness represents the need to feel connected with others and a secure sense of belonging. There is evidence that athletes require all three psychological needs to be satisfied in order for optimal motivation and wellbeing  to  develop.  However,  there  is  also  research that suggests that some needs may be more important in certain circumstances. For example, competence may have a greater impact than relatedness on elite athletes’ motivation.

Coaching Behaviors and Athlete Motivation

When coaches’ actions support their athletes’ needs, self-determined  motivation  will  develop.  When coaches’ behavior undermines these needs, athletes are likely to experience increased controlled motivation.  Therefore,  it  is  important  to  understand  the specific aspects of coaching behaviors that are positively or negatively related to athlete motivation.

Coaches’ behavior can be classified in a variety of ways. When exploring motivation from a SDT perspective,  coaches’  provision  of  psychological needs support is often examined. Specifically, support that pertains to each of the three psychological needs has been investigated: autonomy support, competence  support,  and  relatedness  support. When a coach acts in an autonomy supportive way, the coach considers the athletes’ perspective, provides  appropriate  and  meaningful  feedback,  and offers opportunities for choice, while at the same time minimizing the use of pressures and demands to control the athletes. The process of creating an autonomy-supportive  climate  requires  considerable  skill,  particularly  considering  the  authoritarian role that coaches have often been expected to play  in  the  past.  Even  within  the  somewhat  rigid structure  of  many  organized  sports,  coaches  can take  steps  to  create  an  autonomy-supportive  climate  for  their  athletes.  Specifically,  researchers suggest a number of key practices that would help a coach become autonomy supportive:

  1. Provide choice—athletes making decisions about some aspects of a training session.
  2. Provide a rationale for tasks, limits, and rules— explaining the reasons behind key coaching decisions.
  3. Inquire about and acknowledge athletes’ feelings—getting to know athletes as people first and athletes second; acknowledging that some training drills may be repetitive or tedious.
  4. Promote athlete responsibility—allowing athletes to create and deliver a training drill.
  5. Provide non-controlling competence feedback— having constructive feedback that is solution focused rather than problem focused.
  6. Avoid guilt inducing criticisms and controlling statements—providing critiques that focus on the behavior, not the athletes’ character.
  7. Limit ego involvement—encouraging athletes to improve their own performance, avoiding intrateam rivalries and social comparisons.

Studies exploring the relationship between coach autonomy support and athlete outcomes suggest a positive  relationship  exists.  For  example,  various studies  report  that  athletes  who  perceived  their coach to be autonomy supportive displayed greater levels  of  psychological  and  physical  well-being, self-determined  motivation,  sport  persistence  and adherence,  enjoyment,  and  positive  appraisal  for their sports participation.

Coaching  research  based  on  SDT  has  largely focused on autonomy support. However, competence and  relatedness  support  have  also  received  some attention. A coach who supports the athletes’ sense of competence by helping his athletes set clear and realistic  performance  targets,  for  example,  ensures those  athletes  have  the  necessary  information  and experience to develop and progress. Additionally, a coach who displays high levels of involvement with relatedness support ensures the athletes feel a sense of belonging and connection. Research suggests all three types of coach support (autonomy, competence, and relatedness support) create a favorable environment for the satisfaction of athletes’ needs.

Unfortunately,  the  very  nature  of  organized sport can lend itself to the development of a controlling climate that undermines athletes’ needs for autonomy,  competence,  and  relatedness.  Offering rewards  with  a  condition  attached,  such  as  an activity if athletes satisfy the coach’s expectations, is  a  common  practice.  Also,  athletes’  schedules are  often  planned  well  in  advance,  thus  creating  rigid  deadlines  for  training  and  performance. Additionally, athletes’ choice is often limited, particularly in youth sport, as coaches take ownership for developing strategies that they believe will provide  their  athletes  with  a  competitive  advantage. Hence,  it  is  unsurprising  that  many  coaches  tend to favor a controlling style, whereby their athletes feel pressured to think, feel, or behave in a set way. As  a  result,  athletes  will  often  comply  with,  but may  not  fully  support,  requests  from  the  coach, which contributes to the development of controlled motivation (non-self-determined). Coaching behaviors  that  are  viewed  as  controlling  include  the following:

  • offering rewards such as guaranteed selection to motivate athletes if they put all their effort into training;
  • using feedback that pressures athletes to continue with their behavior;
  • making demands concerning aspects of an athlete’s life not associated with sport participation;
  • intimidating athletes by using verbal abuse or threats;
  • promoting rivalry among athletes; and
  • withholding affection and attention if athletes don’t perform to an expected standard.

Unfortunately, little is known about the impact of these controlling coach strategies. A number of studies   suggest   that   athletes   who   viewed   their coach  to  predominantly  display  autocratic  and controlling behaviors reported less self-determined motivation and greater levels of controlled motivation.  Recent  research  indicates  that  athletes  who view  their  coach  as  using  controlling  strategies report  low  levels  of  psychological  needs  satisfaction.  In  turn,  these  low  levels  of  psychological needs satisfaction have been associated with negative  athlete  outcomes,  such  as  disordered  eating behaviors,   depression,   burnout,   and   negative affect.  These  findings  suggest  that  although  controlling  behaviors  may  sometimes  appear  to  be adaptive in that they prompt desired behaviors and performance  outcomes  in  the  short  term,  these behaviors may contribute to negative outcomes in the long term.

It  is  important  to  note  that  a  coach  can  display  elements  of  controlling  and  needs-supportive behavior.  A  coach  may  frequently  issue  additional physical exercises to the athletes as a discipline strategy  (controlling  behavior)  but  may  often  provide opportunities for player input about other aspects of training  (autonomy-supportive  behavior).  It  is  also important to note that the lack of needs-supportive behaviors  does  not  automatically  necessitate  the presence  of  controlling  coach  behaviors.  The  lack of  needs  support  might,  for  instance,  simply  be  a sign of a more neutral rather than a controlling style. Nonetheless, in terms of the impact of these different coaching styles, needs support versus controlling behavior, the majority of studies indicate that needs supportive behaviors are associated with self-determined motivation and positive athlete outcomes.

Autonomy-Supportive Approaches

These   research   findings   provoke   an   important  question  as  to  whether  it  is  possible  for  a sports coach to learn how to become more needs supportive  and  less  controlling.  While  a  need-ssupportive  coach  training  program  has  yet  to  be experimentally  tested,  preliminary  evidence  demonstrates  that  needs-supportive  practices  can  be employed  by  coaches  working  with  elite  athletes. Clifford Mallet described an autonomy-supportive approach  when  coaching  two  Australian  relay teams  competing  at  the  2004  Athens  Olympic Games.  Some  of  his  autonomy  supportive  strategies included (1) providing choice to the athletes in a number of management and performance areas; (2)  providing  a  rationale  for  executive  decisions; (3) actively seeking suggestions, opinions, and feedback from athletes and their personal coaches; and (4)  encouraging  athletes  to  take  personal  responsibility  for  their  learning.  Mallet  concluded  that by  adopting  this  autonomy  supportive  approach he  promoted  their  levels  of  self-determined  motivation.  This  preliminary  evidence  suggests  that needs-supportive coaching is feasible, even in elite sport settings.

Additional  evidence  supporting  the  potential efficacy  of  needs-supportive  coach  training  programs  comes  from  intervention  studies  designed to  improve  coaches’  interpersonal  skills.  Although not  focused  specifically  on  needs  support,  these studies provide evidence that coaches can learn to alter  their  interpersonal  behaviors  when  working with  athletes.  For  example,  coaches  can  learn  to (a) provide instruction and encouragement, (b) avoid sarcasm or degrading comments, (c) establish  clear expectations,  and  (d)  avoid  nagging  or  threatening athletes. Promisingly, coaches who participated in  these  training  programs  were  evaluated  more positively by their athletes compared with athletes whose  coaches  did  not  take  part.  Additionally,  a variety of positive athlete outcomes were reported. For  example,  compared  with  controls,  athletes  of the trained coaches displayed lower levels of anxiety and  drop-out,  higher  levels  of  healthy  motivation and fun, and a greater liking for their teammates.

Finally,  research  outside  of  the  sport  setting indicates that authority figures like teachers, managers,  and  health  care  professionals  can  successfully alter their interactions to become more needs supportive after attending a training program and this increased support had positive effects on subordinates’  motivational  outcomes.  Coach  education research has taken this evidence on board and preliminary  guidelines  are  now  available  and  can help coaches learn how to be needs supportive in their interactions with their athletes.

Conclusion

There  is  a  great  deal  of  evidence  that  needs-supportive  coaching  is  associated  with  more  positive forms of motivation and better experiences for athletes. Preliminary data suggests that sport coaches can  learn  to  effectively  apply  needs-supportive coaching principles. Further research is required to test the effects of coach training programs specifically designed to promote needs support and lessen controlling coaching.

References:

  1. A. J. (2007). Coaching effectiveness: Exploring the relationship between coaching behavior and self-determined motivation. In M. S. Hagger & N. L. D. Chatzisarantis (Eds.), Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in exercise and sport (pp. 209–227). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
  2. Mageau, G. A., & Vallerand, R. J. (2003). The coach athlete relationship: A motivational model. Journal of Sports Sciences, 21, 883–904.
  3. Mallett, C. J. (2005). Self-determination theory: A case study of evidence-based coaching. The Sport Psychologist, 19(4), 417–429.
  4. Treasure, D. C., Lemyre, P., Kuczka, K. K., & Standage, M. (2007). Motivation in elite-level sport. In M. S. Hagger & N. L. D. Chatzisarantis (Eds.), Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in exercise and sport (pp. 153–164). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

See also:

  • Sports Psychology
  • Sports Leadership

Autonomy: Embracing Independence in Our Daily Lives

In a world that often urges conformity and reliance on systems, the quest for autonomy has never been more relevant. Embracing independence in our daily lives allows us to reclaim our choices, foster creativity, and cultivate a sense of empowerment. Whether it’s in our personal relationships, career paths, or everyday decisions, the ability to navigate our own course can lead to a richer, more fulfilling existence. This article explores the multifaceted nature of autonomy, its benefits, and practical ways we can embrace independence to enhance our well-being and personal growth. Join us as we delve into the transformative power of living life on our own terms.

The term autonomy literally means “self-governing” and thus connotes regulation by the self (auto). Its opposite, heteronomy, refers to regulation by “otherness” (heteron) and thus by forces “other than,” or alien to, the self. In short, autonomy concerns the extent to which a person’s acts are self-determined instead of being coerced or compelled.

Within the field of psychology, the concept of autonomy is both central and controversial. Autonomy is central in that developmental (child), personality, and clinical psychologists have long considered autonomy to be a hallmark of maturation and healthy or optimal functioning. It is controversial in that the concept of autonomy is often confused with concepts such as independence, separateness, and free will, generating debates concerning its relevance and import across periods of development, gender, and individualist versus collectivist cultures.

The issue of autonomy was originally imported into social psychology through the work of Fritz Heider and Richard deCharms. Heider argued that it is people’s “naive psychology” (their intuitive understanding) that determines how they interpret events and therefore how and why they act as they do. Among the most important dimensions within his naive psychology was Heider’s distinction between personal causation, in which behaviors are intended by their authors, and impersonal causation, in which actions or events are brought about by forces not in personal control. Heider reasoned that individuals usually hold people responsible only for behaviors that they personally caused or intended. Subsequently, deCharms elaborated on Heider’s thinking by distinguishing two types of personal causation. Some intentional acts are ones a person wants to do and for which he or she feels initiative and will. These are actions deCharms said have an internal perceived locus of causality. Other intentional behaviors are attributed to forces outside the self, and these have an external] perceived locus of causality.

Self-determination theory is a contemporary perspective that builds upon the Heider and deCharms tradition with a comprehensive theory of autonomy as it relates to motivation. Self-determination theory specifically defines autonomy as the self-determination of one’s behavior; autonomous action is behavior the actor stands behind and, if reflective, would endorse and value. That is, autonomy represents a sense of volition, or the feeling of doing something by one’s own decision or initiative. The opposite of autonomous action is controlled motivation, in which behavior is experienced as, brought about, or caused by forces that are alien or external to one’s self. Controlled actions are those a person does without a sense of volition or willingness.

Any behavior can be viewed as lying along a continuum ranging from less to more autonomy. The least autonomous behaviors are those that are motivated by externally imposed rewards and punishments. Externally regulated actions are dependent on the continued presence of outside pressure or reinforcements and thus, in most contexts, are poorly maintained. A student who does homework only because parents reward him or her for doing so is externally regulated but not very autonomous. When the rewards stop, the effort on homework may also fade. Somewhat less controlled are introjected regulations, in which a person’s behaviors are regulated by avoidance of shame and guilt and, on the positive side, by desires for self-and other-approval. When a teenager refrains from cheating because he or she would feel guilty, this would be introjected, because the teenager is controlling him- or herself with guilt. Still more autonomous are integrated regulations, in which the person consciously values his or her actions and finds them fitting with his or her other values and motives. A person who acts from a deeply held moral belief would be acting from an integrated regulation and would feel very autonomous. Finally, some behaviors are intrinsically motivated, which means they are inherently fun or enjoyable. A person who plays tennis after school just for fun is intrinsically motivated and would feel autonomous in doing it.

Several theorists in social and personality psychology have suggested that autonomy is a basic psychological need. This is because in general, when people behave autonomously, they feel better and perform better. Lack of autonomy makes people lose interest in their work and can even make them sick. Accordingly, factors that support autonomy can enhance not only the quality of motivation but also the individual’s overall adjustment.

Many studies demonstrate how social events can affect perceived autonomy and, in turn, people’s ongoing motivation. When parents, teachers, or bosses use rewards to control behavior, pressure people with evaluations, take away their choices, or closely watch over them, people typically feel controlled. Conversely, when authorities provide others more choice, allow them to express opinions and make inputs, and provide positive and noncritical feedback, they foster greater autonomy and enhance motivation and persistence.

The topic of how external rewards can affect people’s autonomy has been very extensively studied and is very controversial, because it is a very important issue in settings such as work, school, and family life. Studies show that when rewards are administered in a manner intended to control the behavior or performance of recipients, they typically undermine a sense of autonomy and thus diminish both interest and intrinsic motivation. Thus, a child who is learning to play a new musical instrument might become less interested after someone gives her a reward for playing. Now the child would only want to play if again rewarded, which means the child is less intrinsically motivated. However, rewards can also be used in non-controlling ways, such as when they are given unexpectedly or as an acknowledgement of competence; when given in this way, rewards usually do not under-mine autonomy.

As noted previously, autonomy is a concept that is often confused with independence. One simple way to distinguish these ideas is to think of independence as not relying on others for resources or supports, whereas autonomy concerns how volitional or self-determined one is. Thus, people can be autonomously or willingly dependent, as when they choose to rely on someone else for help. People can also be forced to rely on some-body else, in which case they would lack autonomy. Similarly, one can be heteronomously independent, as when forced to “go it alone,” or autonomously independent, as when one desires to do something by oneself, without getting help.

Distinguishing autonomy from independence is especially critical for developmental and cross-cultural studies. For example, research has suggested that adolescents who autonomously rely on parents tend to be better adjusted than those who are more detached or independent of parents. It is also clear that cultures differ greatly in values regarding independence, with individualist cultures placing greater value on people acting independently and collectivist cultures more focused on interdependence. Research suggests, however, that whether a person engages in individualist or collectivist practices, it still matters whether or not they feel autonomous. It appears that people in all cultures feel better when they are acting choicefully, even though what they normatively do may differ. This is why people around the world often fight for freedoms and the right to pursue what they truly value.

Similarly, autonomy is not associated with separateness. Separateness refers to a lack of connection with close others. People can be very autonomously connected with others, as when they love someone and want to be close to that person. Indeed, people are often very autonomous in trying to connect with and take care of people they love.

Another important distinction is between autonomy and free will. Free will, by most interpretations, involves some notion of an undetermined action, or action that is caused by a soul or self that is completely independent of an environment. Autonomy, in contrast, does not have these implications. Most social scientists believe that all behaviors have an impetus or cause either within the organism or its environment. But even if all actions are caused in this sense, they can still vary considerably in the degree to which they are volitional or autonomous.

Practical applications of research on autonomy can be found everywhere. Insofar as people who are acting autonomously are more persistent, perform better, and are more adjusted, it becomes important to identify factors in the real world that facilitate autonomy. Thus there has been a lot of research on how to support autonomy in domains such as education, sport, work, health care, and psychotherapy. Across domains, both the structure of incentives and supervision styles have been shown to influence autonomy and the positive outcomes associated with it.

Autonomy also is something that can be cultivated from within. Because autonomy concerns regulating behavior through the self, it is enhanced by a person’s capacity to reflect and evaluate his or her own actions. One can learn to engage in reflection that is free, relaxed, or interested, which can help one to avoid acting from impulse or from external or internal compulsion. Within self-determination theory, such reflective processing is characterized by the concepts of awareness and mindfulness. Greater mindfulness can help people be clearer about why they are acting as they are and can provide information that helps them subsequently act with more sense of choice and freedom.

References:

  1. Brown, K. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2003). The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 822-848.
  2. Chirkov, V., Ryan, R. M., Kim, Y., & Kaplan, U. (2003). Differentiating autonomy from individualism and independence: A self-determination theory perspective on internalization of cultural orientations and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 97-110.
  3. deCharms, R. (1968). Personal causation. New York: Academic Press.
  4. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.
  5. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000) Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social devel-opment and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68-78.
  6. Taylor, J. S. (2005). Personal autonomy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Understanding Autonomic Nervous System: The Body’s Hidden Regulator

The autonomic nervous system (ANS) plays a crucial yet often overlooked role in regulating many of the body’s involuntary functions, from heart rate and digestion to respiratory rate and stress responses. As the body’s hidden regulator, the ANS operates beneath our conscious awareness, seamlessly coordinating our physiology in response to internal and external stimuli. This article delves into the intricate workings of the ANS, exploring its two main branches—the sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous systems—and how they balance our body’s responses to various challenges. By understanding the ANS, we can gain valuable insights into our health and well-being, unlocking the potential for improved stress management, enhanced physical performance, and overall better quality of life.

The  central  nervous  system  (CNS)  is  composed of  the  brain  and  spinal  cord.  The  CNS  receives sensory  information  from  the  peripheral  nervous  system  and  controls  the  body’s  responses. The peripheral nervous system involves all of the nerves  outside  of  the  brain  and  spinal  cord  that carry messages to and from the CNS. The peripheral nervous system has two branches: the somatic nervous  system  and  the  autonomic  nervous  system.  The  somatic  nervous  system  controls  skeletal  muscle  as  well  as  external  sensory  organs such  as  the  skin.  This  system  is  described  as  voluntary  because  the  responses  can  be  controlled consciously,  although  reflex  reactions  of  skeletal muscles are an exception.

The  autonomic  nervous  system  is  the  branch of  the  peripheral  nervous  system  that  controls involuntary  actions,  such  as  pulmonary  respiration  (breathing),  heart  rate  and  the  force  of  contraction  of  the  heart,  and  vasoconstriction  and dilation (widening and narrowing of blood vessels) that impact blood pressure. This system is further divided into two systems: the sympathetic system and  the  parasympathetic  system.  The  sympathetic  division  of  the  autonomic  nervous  system regulates flight-or-fight responses. This division is responsible for tasks such as relaxing the bladder, increasing heart rate, and dilating eye pupils. The parasympathetic  division  of  the  autonomic  nervous  system  supports  homeostasis  and  conserves physical  resources.  This  division  performs  tasks such  as  controlling  the  bladder,  slowing  down heart rate, and constricting eye pupils.

Like  other  nerves,  those  of  the  autonomic nervous  system  convey  their  messages  to  the appropriate  end  organs  (blood  vessels,  viscera, etc.) by releasing transmitter substances to which the  receptors  of  the  target  cells  are  responsive. The  most  important  of  these  transmitters  in  the autonomic  nervous  system  are  acetylcholine  and norepinephrine.  In  the  parasympathetic  system, acetylcholine is responsible for most of these transmissions  between  the  afferent  (leading  toward the CNS) and efferent nerves (leading away from the CNS) and between the efferent nerve endings that  innervate  cells  or  organs.  Acetylcholine  also serves  to  transmit  nerve-to-nerve  messages  in  the afferent nerves and the brain centers of the sympathetic nervous system. Norepinephrine is released from sympathetic nerve endings to end organs or cells, except at the sweat glands where acetylcholine is released. Epinephrine is also released from the  adrenal  medulla  in  response  to  sympathetic activation.

The  rate  and  strength  of  cardiac  contractions is  under  the  predominant  control  of  the  sympathetic  nervous  system.  Sympathetic  stimuli  from cardiac nerves cause acceleration of the heart rate. Increases  in  heart  rate  are  also  complemented  by simultaneous  reduction  in  the  parasympathetic stimuli via the vagus nerve, which is responsible for slowing the heart rate. Thus, heart rate responses are often used as indirect measures of sympathetic and  parasympathetic  activity  (autonomic  nervous system activation).

Situations  such  as  emotional  excitement,  fear, apprehension,  psychological  distress,  panic  reactions,   and   fight-or-flight   stimuli   activate   the sympathetic  nervous  system.  In  addition,  the activation   of   the   autonomic   nervous   system, often demonstrated in preparation for and during activity, has been an area of investigation in sport and  exercise  physiology.  Noninvasive  measures of  autonomic  function  (heart  rate,  blood  pressure, galvanic skin response, etc.) have been used to  investigate  the  role  of  the  peripheral  nervous system  in  human  performance,  infer  affect  and infer changes in affect during and following physical activity, understand the effects of overtraining, and  explain  potential  positive  adaptations  that occur in parallel with improvements in fitness. In summary, biofeedback studies have demonstrated a  relationship  between  effective  control  of  autonomic  function  and  human  performance,  a  number of affective states have been shown to correlate with  autonomic  responses,  overtraining  seems  to be  associated  with  parasympathetic  dysfunction, and  improvements  in  fitness  are  associated  with enhanced  parasympathetic  tone  and  diminished sympathetic activity. More specifically, the changes in  response  to  aerobic  training  seem  to  occur primarily  due  to  an  alteration  in  the  balance  of sympathetic  and  parasympathetic  activity.  With training,  several  adaptations,  including  enhanced parasympathetic  tone  and  increased  stroke  volume,  explain  the  reduction  in  resting  heart  rate. At  rest  the  enhanced  parasympathetic  activity seen in trained individuals leads to a reduction in heart rate; however, when presented with a mental challenge, trained individuals demonstrate greater vagal withdrawal and possibly an enhanced sympathetic  response  compared  with  untrained  individuals. This adaptation seems to be beneficial for cardiovascular health.

References:

  1. Acevedo, E. O., Webb, H. E., & Huang, C. J. (2012). Cardiovascular health implications of combined mental and physical challenge. In E. O. Acevedo (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of exercise psychology (pp. 169–191). New York: Oxford University Press.
  2. Boutcher, S. H., & Hamer, M. (2006). Psychobiological reactivity, physical activity, and cardiovascular health. In E. O. Acevedo & P. Ekkekakis (Eds.), Psychobiology of physical activity (pp. 161–175). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

See also:

  • Sports Psychology
  • Psychophysiology

Automatism: Exploring the Unconscious Mind in Art and Creativity

In a world where the conscious mind often dominates our thoughts and actions, the concept of automatism invites us to explore the untamed landscape of the unconscious. This intriguing phenomenon, rooted in psychological theories and artistic movements, reveals how spontaneity and instinct can serve as powerful catalysts for creativity. From the surrealists’ automatic drawings to contemporary practices that embrace free expression, automatism challenges our understanding of artistic creation and personal expression. By tapping into the depths of our subconscious, artists uncover layers of meaning and experience that are otherwise obscured, illuminating the complex relationship between art and the human psyche. This article delves into the rich history, techniques, and implications of automatism in shaping the creative process, inviting readers to reconsider the role of the unconscious in their own artistic journeys.

Automatism is an excuse defense against criminal liability for defendants who committed a presumptively criminal act in a state of unconsciousness, semiconsciousness, or unawareness. Medically, the term automatism refers to motor behavior that is automatic, undirected, and not consciously controlled. The use of automatism as a legal defense is relatively rare and is typically claimed in cases where the defendant’s conscious awareness is compromised by epilepsy, brain injury, somnambulism (sleepwalking), or trauma. The automatism defense is recognized as a viable defense in U.S. and British courts, but the definitions and applications of the defense vary widely and are often inconsistent. The basis for the defense is that a defendant should not be held responsible for presumptively criminal actions because of the involuntary nature of the behaviors, leading to lack of criminal intent and voluntary criminal action.

Automatism Excuses and Justifications

In criminal law, there is a general rule that individuals are to be held legally responsible for their actions. Our fundamental and longstanding societal values and moral traditions allow for several exceptions in situations in which it would not be fair or just to hold persons criminally liable. These exceptions are discussed under the general heading of defenses, which, in turn, have been distinguished as justifications and excuses. Justifications seek to establish that even though the prosecution may have fulfilled its required burden to prove the basic facts of the offense, the act committed by the defendant was not criminal because, for example, it was done in defense of self, others, or property. Excuses essentially concede the wrongfulness of the act but seek to establish that the defendant is not criminally responsible because the act took place, for example, under conditions of duress or compulsion, immaturity, or insanity.

Automatism is an excuse defense that has been characterized as similar to the excuse of ignorance. That is, an automatism can be defined as an action taken without any knowledge of acting or without consciousness of what is being done. Automatism, however, is not simply a matter of acting out of ignorance. In the case of ignorance, a defendant may be acting based on an erroneous belief (e.g., the defendant believes that he or she is administering first aid but is, rather, exacerbating a medical condition of the victim), but in the case of automatism, the defendant is unaware that he or she is acting at all.

Actus Reus and Mens Rea

Except in cases of strict liability, any crime contains two elements: the actus reus (“guilty act”) and mens rea (“guilty mind”). The automatism defense seeks to prove that the defendant made physical actions (automatisms) that led to a bad outcome but did not perform a guilty act. As such, the automatism defense is the only excuse defense that is based on the actus reus element rather being purely a mens rea excuse defense (e.g., insanity). In an insanity defense, the defense acknowledges the guilty act but claims that the defendant should not be held blameworthy due to the lack of a guilty mind or intent.

Another way of understanding these two elements would be to consider if the presumptively criminal act was intentional or voluntary. Actions directed toward a goal are typically considered to be intentional. An automatism defense, however, claims that the actions taken are automatic and, therefore, not intentional. In the case of some automatic movements (e.g., loss of muscular control during a grand mal seizure), the absence of intentionality is obvious. In some cases, however, this judgment can be exceedingly difficult. For example, intentionality is far less obvious in a defendant who engaged in goal-directed aggression during a period of postictal confusion following a nocturnal partial complex seizure when the defendant appeared to be sleepwalking. The issue of volitional control (voluntariness) goes directly to the heart of the automatism defense. The Model Penal Code of the American Law Institute states that a defendant is not criminally liable if he or she does not commit a “vol-untary act,” which is defined to exclude “reflex or convulsion” or actions taken during “unconsciousness.” There can be no actus reus when the defendant does not commit a voluntary act. Typically, courts have required that volitional dyscontrol be total; that is, the actor (defendant) has no control over his or her actions.

The Automatism Defense: Case Law

Although its use is relatively rare, the automatism defense has been established as a criminal defense in courts in the United States and Britain. Courts vary widely, however, in definitions and applications of the defense. In the United States, for example, some courts have applied the rationale of an insanity defense, interpreting the involuntary behaviors associated with automatisms as a defect in reason that prevented the defendant from knowing the nature and quality of his or her act, therefore making an automatism defense a mens rea defense. Other courts have stressed the involuntary nature of the defendant’s actions, focusing on the lack of actus reus. British courts have made a distinction between sane and insane automatism. A defense of insane automatism requires that the defendant meet all three conditions of the British insanity defense (the M’Naghten standard), where the automatism would be the “disorder of reason” caused by a “disease of the mind,” leading to the defendant not knowing the “nature and quality of his act or that it was wrongful.” Defendants who raise an automatism defense and who meet M’Naghten standards would be adjudicated under the “not guilty by reason of insanity” (NGRI) standard. The defendant who raises the defense and who does not meet the standard would be claiming sane automatism, seeking to challenge that his or her behavior was simply not a voluntary act. If such a defense were successful, the defendant would be acquitted and not subjected to the possible consequences (e.g., commitment to a psychiatric facility) faced by an NGRI acquittee. British courts have indicated that sane automatism is an acceptable defense when the defendant has suffered from a defect of reason but not a disease of the mind, usually due to some external physical factor. The sequelae of a head injury or confusion as a result of the administration of drugs would be examples of such external causes of automatism.

References:

  1. Borum, R., & Appelbaum, K. L. (1996). Epilepsy, aggression, and criminal responsibility. Psychiatric Services, 47(7), 762-763.
  2. Reznek, L. (1997). Evil or ill? Justifying the insanity defense. London: Routledge.
  3. Schopp, R. F. (1991). Automatism, insanity, and the psychology of criminal responsibility: A philosophical inquiry. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Return to Criminal Behavior overview.

Understanding Automaticity: The Power of Implicit Attitudes in Everyday Life

In our daily lives, we often find ourselves making quick decisions and judgments without consciously thinking about them. This phenomenon, known as automaticity, reveals the profound influence of implicit attitudes—unconscious evaluations and beliefs that shape our thoughts and behaviors. From the way we perceive strangers to our reactions in social situations, these automatic responses play a crucial role in how we navigate the world around us. Understanding the power of implicit attitudes can shed light on the underlying mechanisms of our behavior, allowing us to better understand ourselves and improve our interactions with others. This article explores the concept of automaticity, its implications in everyday life, and the importance of raising awareness about our unconscious biases.

Implicit  attitudes,  also  referred  to  as  automatic evaluations, are immediate and spontaneous evaluations  of  objects,  groups,  or  behaviors  as  being pleasant  or  unpleasant.  They  occur  unintentionally  within  a  fraction  of  a  second  after  exposure to  the  stimulus,  preceding  any  reflective  deliberation.  Typically,  these  attitudes  are  inferred from  systematic  variations  of  performance  on indirect  priming  or  categorization  tasks.  Implicit attitudes  can  collaborate  or  conflict  with  more controlled  and  deliberated  explicit  attitudes  to influence  decisions  and  behaviors.  It  has  been shown  that  implicit  attitudes  predict  physical activity behavior, but little research has been conducted on implicit attitudes in the context of sport. This  entry  briefly  overviews  (a)  measurement, (b) attitudinal concordance with explicit attitudes, (c)  proposed  origins,  and  (d)  proposed  consequences  of  implicit  attitudes.  Special  emphasis  is placed on implicit attitudes in the context of physical activity and sport.

Measurement

Implicit attitudes are typically measured indirectly via  performance  tasks  because  self-assessment (self-report)  is  susceptible  to  inaccuracy  due  to people’s lack of awareness or willingness to report their  implicit  attitudes.  The  most  common  methods  for  implicit  attitude  assessments  are  priming procedures  or  categorization  tasks,  such  as  the Implicit Association Tests (IAT). Given the nature of  response  latency  tests,  error  variability  can  be easily introduced (e.g., distraction, sneeze, fatigue). This,  among  other  concerns  about  validity  and reliability  of  the  measures,  remains  an  important issue in the field.

Attitudinal Concordance With Explicit Attitudes

Research suggests implicit attitudes are related, but distinct, from explicit attitudes. Implicit attitudes are  automatic,  efficient,  rapid,  and  goal-independent evaluations that involve the neural circuits of the  amygdala  and  right  insula;  explicit  attitudes are  effortful,  deliberative,  and  controlled  evaluations  that  involve  areas  of  the  frontal  cortex. Explicit attitudes may serve to override or validate implicit  attitudes  through  reflective  cost–benefit analyses,  especially  when  ample  motivation  and opportunity  to  deliberate  is  present.  Implicit  and explicit attitudes typically show weak positive correlations  within  studies,  although  the  magnitude of the relation differs as a function of the attitude being assessed. For example, implicit and explicit attitudes are largely divergent for socially sensitive topics  where  impression  management  may  occur, as  with  racial  prejudices,  but  less  divergent  for topics toward which people have little motivation to  disguise  their  attitudes,  as  with  preference  for flowers.  The  magnitude  of  the  relation  between implicit  and  explicit  attitudes  also  is  a  function of  study  design.  Correlations  are  strongest  when there is strong convergence of the conceptual and format structure of the implicit and explicit measures, for example. Implicit and explicit attitudes toward  physical  activity  have  been  shown  to  be independent  of  one  another,  but  little  is  known about  concordance  of  implicit  and  explicit  attitudes in the context of sport.

Proposed Origins

The  origins  of  implicit  attitudes  are  not  fully understood; however, there is research connecting implicit attitudes to early emotional responses to the stimuli, such as averseness of the first cigarette smoked  and  to  more  recently  learned  affective associations, such as priming associations between valence and object. Implicit attitudes tend to show low  or  moderate  stability  across  time,  supporting the notion that they comprise both trait and state-like  components.  Although  some  aspect  of implicit  attitudes  may  be  resistant  to  change,  it seems  that  appropriate  environmental  pairings have  potential  to  counter  these  learned  associations.  Most  theories  propose  that  implicit  attitudes  are  some  manifestation  of  both  early  and recent experiences, but it has also been proposed that implicit attitudes represent knowledge of cultural  biases,  rather  than  personal  attitudes.  Very little  is  understood  about  the  origins  of  implicit attitudes  in  the  context  of  physical  activity  and sport.

Consequences

Implicit attitudes have been shown to have physiological  consequences,  such  as  an  elevated  heart rate  response  to  stimuli;  cognitive  consequences, such  as  phobias  and  judgments;  and  behavioral consequences, such as prejudice and consumer and voting  behavior.  Within  an  evolutionary  context, implicit  attitudes  have  been  proposed  as  a  survival strategy to quickly differentiate hostile from friendly stimuli. Favorable implicit attitudes elicit immediate  approach  behavior,  whereas  unfavorable  implicit  attitudes  elicit  immediate  avoidance behavior.  Implicit  attitudes  seem  to  guide  behavior without people’s conscious awareness. Implicit and explicit attitudes have been shown to predict unique portions of variance of the same behavior and to interact to predict behavior. Additionally, a double-dissociative  connection  between  attitudes and behavior has been supported in which implicit and explicit attitudes predict behaviors under different  circumstances.  Whereas  explicit  attitudes tend  to  direct  volitional  behavior  or  behavior when  people  have  ample  time  and  resources  to deliberate,  implicit  attitudes  tend  to  direct  spontaneous  behaviors  or  behaviors  when  people  are under  time  pressure,  distracted,  or  unmotivated for reflective deliberation. Physical activity and fitness  level  have  also  been  shown  to  be  related  to implicit attitudes above and beyond explicit motivational  constructs.  Again,  little  is  known  about how implicit attitudes may impact outcomes in the competitive or training contexts of sport.

Conclusion

Implicit  attitudes  have  been  shown  to  influence peoples’ physiology, judgments, and behavior independently  of  explicit  attitudes.  It  has  been  established  that  implicit  and  explicit  attitudes  toward physical activity are distinct, and that implicit attitudes  predict  physical  activity  behavior;  however, little is known about the origins or malleability of these  attitudes.  Implicit  attitudes  within  the  context  of  sport  remain  largely  uninvestigated.  The potential for implicit attitudes to serve as an avenue  for  physical  activity  and  sport  interventions needs to be clarified with future research.

References:

  1. Conroy, D. E., Hyde, A. L., Doerksen, S. E., & Ribeiro, N. F. (2010). Implicit attitudes and explicit motivation prospectively predict physical activity. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 39, 112–118.
  2. De Houwer, J., Teige-Mocigemba, S., Spruyt, A., & Moors, A. (2009). Implicit measures: A normative analysis and review. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 347–368.
  3. Evans, J. S. B. T. (2008). Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 255–278.
  4. Greenwald, A. G., Banaji, M. R., Rudman, L. A., Farnham, S. D., Nosek, B. A., & Mellott, D. S. (2002). A unified theory of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, self-esteem, and self-concept. Psychological Review, 109, 3–25.
  5. Nosek, B. A., Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (2006). The Implicit Association Test at age 7: A methodological and conceptual review. In J. A. Bargh (Ed.), Automatic processes in social thinking and behavior (pp. 265–292). New York: Psychology Press.
  6. Perugini, M. (2005). Predictive models of implicit and explicit attitudes. British Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 29–45.
  7. Rudman, L. A. (2004). Sources of implicit attitudes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 79–82.

See also:

  • Sports Psychology
  • Sport Motivation

Automaticity: Evaluative Priming and Its Impact on Our Decisions

In an increasingly fast-paced world, the way we process information and make decisions often occurs beneath the surface of our conscious awareness. One fascinating aspect of this is the concept of automaticity, particularly as it relates to evaluative priming. This psychological phenomenon demonstrates how exposure to certain stimuli can unconsciously shape our attitudes and influence our choices. By exploring the mechanisms of evaluative priming, we uncover the subtle yet profound effects it has on our decision-making processes, driving home the importance of understanding the invisible forces that guide our judgments in daily life.

Priming effects occur when the processing of a target  stimulus  is  influenced  by  a  preceding  stimulus  on  the  basis  of  a  relationship  between  prime and target. Processing of the target word surgeon, for example, may be facilitated by the prime word injury. The priming effect in this example is based on  associative  and  non-evaluative  semantic  relationships between prime and target, and is called semantic priming. Evaluative priming, on the other hand, focuses on evaluative (positive or negative) relationships  between  primes  and  targets.  In  an evaluative  priming  paradigm,  a  positive  or  negative target (delight) is preceded by a prime of the same valence (healthy) or of the opposite valence (failure).

Usually,  participants  in  these  reaction-time tasks  are  asked  to  decide  whether  the  target denotes something positive or negative. Responses are  typically  faster  and  more  accurate  when  the prime and target share the same valence (healthy delight).  Thus,  presentation  of  healthy  as  the prime is likely to automatically activate a positive evaluation. If the target word that is subsequently presented  is  also  positive  (delight),  then  the  individual is likely to respond quickly and accurately to  the  adjective.  If  the  target  word  is  negative, however, response accuracy and speed are likely to be  compromised.  Consequently,  evaluative  priming  effects  are  based  on  a  significant  interaction between the valence of the prime and the valence of the target.

Automatic Evaluation: A Consistent Finding

By using a short timeframe (called stimulus onset asynchrony)  between  the  presentation  of  primes and  targets,  research  on  evaluative  priming  has found  that  evaluative  information  about  stimuli is  activated  very  quickly  (automatically)  upon presentation  of  the  prime.  Also,  the  evaluative priming effect has been replicated numerous times using a variety of experimental stimuli. The effect has  emerged,  for  instance,  when  the  primes  consist  of  words,  pictures,  or  odors.  Moreover,  the effects  have  been  evidenced  when  the  response task given to participants is to evaluate the target (“Is the target word positive or negative?”), when they are asked to pronounce the targets, or when they  are  required  to  generate  a  motor  response task to the primes.

Compatibility Between Automatic Evaluation and Self-Report Evaluation

Traditionally,  to  gauge  people’s  evaluation  of  an object  or  concept,  researchers  have  utilized  self-report measures that invite conscious introspection among  participants.  One  of  the  most  significant benefits of evaluative priming studies, however, is that  they  allow  researchers  to  tap  fast  evaluative processes that often occur without, and sometimes against,  the  respondents’  intentions.  For  research on  socially  sensitive  topics,  such  as  exercise  and body  image,  significant  differences  might  emerge between  these  automatic  evaluations  and  self-report evaluations. Therefore, social stigmatization acts  as  a  possible  moderator  to  the  relationship between  self-report  and  automatic  evaluations. Another possible moderator to this relationship is evaluation  strength.  In  other  words,  people  who possess  strong  automatic  evaluations  of  concepts are also likely to report strong, compatible evaluations in self-report questions. If one has a strong passion for basketball, for example, the individual is likely to report congruent positive evaluations of the sport on both self-report measures and implicit measures.

Research on Consequences of Automatic Evaluation

There  are  two  streams  of  literature  on  the  consequences  of  automatic  evaluation.  One  of  these streams relates to the question of whether primed evaluations  are  predictive  of  approach  or  avoidance  behaviors  toward  that  stimulus.  In  other words,  do  automatic  evaluations  increase  one’s tendency  to  behave  in  particular  ways  toward the  priming  stimulus?  Research  is  now  emerging to suggest that these evaluations can significantly influence one’s reactions toward the stimulus itself. Another stream of research focuses on the implications  of  a  primed  evaluation  for  the  subsequent processing of unrelated stimuli. There is a possibility  that  interpretation  of  ambiguous  stimuli  can be  guided  by  previous  exposure  to  positively  or negatively evaluated primes. In fact, past work has established  that  interpretation  of  words  such  as beat  can  be  guided  by  strongly  valenced  primes, such  that  people  are  more  likely  to  interpret  the word  as  meaning  rhythm  after  a  positive  prime and  hit  after  a  negative  prime.  Collectively,  these findings  suggest  that  one’s  automatic  evaluations of  sport  or  exercise  are  likely  to  predict  the  individual’s approach or avoidance of these activities, as well as influence the interpretation of information about them. Someone who possesses a negative automatic evaluation of exercise, for instance, is likely to reject an offer to join an exercise class without  giving  much  thought  to  the  offer.  Also, that  person  will  be  likely  to  bias  any  ambiguous information in an exercise advertisement (or other communication) in a negative manner.

Mechanisms

Evaluative priming effects are most often discussed in terms of a spreading activation within a participant’s semantic network. According to the spreading  activation  hypothesis,  priming  success,  for example, would make the concept of all positively valenced  representations  more  accessible.  These salient representations are then more readily used to  encode  subsequent  information.  Although  the spreading  activation  account  to  evaluative  priming  has  conceptual  appeal,  it  has  also  been  criticized by some scholars. One of the key criticisms has  been  that  the  spreading  activation  account  is based  on  the  fan  effect.  If  a  prime  stimulus  activates  many  concepts  in  memory  (as  it  would  in the context of evaluative priming), the amount of activation  should  disperse  over  many  pathways, making  the  activation  of  any  one  representation quite  minimal.  Other  mechanisms  for  evaluative priming  have  been  forwarded,  but  more  research is needed to establish which of them offer the best explanation for these effects.

References:

  1. Bluemke, M., Brand, R., Schweizer, G., & Kahlert, D. (2010). Exercise might be good for me, but I don’t feel good about it: Do automatic associations predict exercise behavior? Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 32, 137–153.
  2. Ferguson, M. J., & Bargh, J. A. (2003). The constructive nature of automatic evaluation. In J. Musch & K. C. Klauer (Eds.), The psychology of evaluation: Affective processes in cognition and emotion (pp. 173–193). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  3. Ferguson, M. J., Bargh, J. A., & Nayak, D. A. (2005). After-affects: How automatic evaluations influence the interpretation of subsequent, unrelated stimuli. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 182–191.

See also:

  • Sports Psychology
  • Sport Motivation

Automaticity in Sport: Unlocking Performance Through Unconscious Skill Mastery

In the fast-paced world of sports, where split-second decisions can determine victory or defeat, the concept of automaticity stands as a pivotal factor in elite performance. Automaticity refers to the ability to execute skills and movements effortlessly and unconsciously, honing athletes’ proficiency to a degree that allows them to focus on strategy and situational awareness instead of mechanics. This article delves into the science behind unconscious skill mastery, exploring how athletes can unlock their full potential through repetitive practice, mental conditioning, and the neural pathways that underpin these automatic behaviors. By understanding the principles of automaticity, athletes can elevate their performance, enhancing not only their individual capabilities but also their team’s overall effectiveness in high-pressure environments.

Automaticity is the ability to execute a skill using no (or very few) information processing resources: attention and working memory. When a skill can be  executed  in  this  fashion,  the  performer  has resources  available  to  process  other  sources  of information  not  directly  required  for  the  task. Automaticity is thought to be a hallmark of expert performance that is acquired through learning and extensive  practice.  A  breakdown  of  automaticity  resulting  from  a  performer  turning  attention inward toward skill execution is thought to be one of  the  primary  causes  of  choking  under  pressure (see also the “Attentional Focus” entry).

When  one  performs  a  skill,  there  are  different modes of control that can be used. At one extreme, commonly  called  controlled  processing  mode,  a performer executes an action by following a series of explicit steps that are held in working memory and  by  focusing  attention  on  each  part  of  the action.  Each  stage  during  skill  execution  is  consciously  controlled  and  monitored.  For  example, when  executing  a  complex  movement  in  sports, the performer must remember the instructions to position  different  body  parts  and  focus  attention on  these  parts  to  determine  if  positioning  is  correct.  In  this  performance  mode,  the  information processing demands of the skill are very high and there  are  few,  if  any,  leftover  resources  available for  processing  task-irrelevant  information.  At the  other  extreme,  commonly  called  automatic processing  mode,  skill  execution  relies  on  motor programs  or  procedures  that,  once  initiated,  run without the use of attentional or working-memory resources.  The  skill  is  executed  unconsciously as  it  is  thought  to  involve  muscle  memory  (well-developed  internal  commands  for  how  the  different  body  parts  should  be  moved)  rather  than high-level  cognitive  control.  In  this  performance mode,  the  performer  has  information  processing resources  available  for  handling  task-irrelevant information.  Planning  a  play  to  be  executed  on the  next  possession  in  basketball  is  an  example of  a  highly  controlled  task,  whereas  running down  the  court  is  thought  to  be  a  highly  automatic one.

As  first  proposed  by  Paul  Fitts,  the  controlled and automatic processing modes are thought to be characteristics of the early and late stages of skill acquisition,  respectively.  For  novice  performers, it has been proposed that skill execution requires that attention be paid to each component stage of the  motor  act  (in  golf,  back-swing,  down-swing, club-head angle in putting). At this level of performance, referred to as the cognitive or declarative stage,  it  is  assumed  that  skill  execution  depends on  a  set  of  unintegrated  control  structures  that must  be  held  in  working  memory  and  attended in  a  step-by-step  fashion.  The  attentional  and memory  requirements  result  in  the  slow,  non-fluent,  and  error-prone  movement  execution  that  is characteristic  of  a  novice  performer.  As  expertise develops  through  practice  and  the  performer reaches  the  highest  stage  of  skill  execution  (the autonomous  or  procedural  stage),  it  has  been proposed  that  the  role  of  attention  and  working memory in performance changes dramatically. As procedural  knowledge  develops,  the  conscious step-by-step  control  of  execution  is  no  longer required.  Instead,  skill  execution  is  assumed  to operate  by  fast,  efficient  control  procedures  that function largely without the assistance of working memory or attention. At this final stage, it is proposed that skill automaticity has been achieved. It is  frequently  also  proposed  that  automatic  skills are encapsulated such that, once they are initiated, it is difficult for the performer to inhibit or disrupt them.

A  key  advantage  that  automaticity  is  thought to give an athlete is the availability of attentional and  working-memory  resources  to  process  information in the environment not directly related to movement  control.  First,  the  performer  is  more likely to detect situational or contextual information that is not required for movement control but may  serve  to  improve  performance  success.  If  an expert  footballer  does  not  need  to  actively  monitor the position of the body when taking a penalty kick,  that  player  will  have  processing  capacity available to attend to the movements of the goalkeeper.  Second,  the  performer  is  less  likely  to  be affected by the introduction of stimuli completely irrelevant to the task like a fan yelling an insult or waving hands in the background.

Theories  of  skill  acquisition  and  automaticity make several predictions about the nature of performance  (and  the  supporting  attentional  mechanisms  and  memory  structures)  as  a  function  of skill level. For example, if it involves the automatic processing  mode,  expert  performance  should  be (a) unaffected by the introduction of an irrelevant secondary task that requires attentional or working  memory  resources,  and  (b)  associated  with  a poorer  ability  to  verbalize  the  stages  involved  in skill  execution  (expertise-induced  amnesia)  since these  stages  are  not  attended  or  held  actively  in memory.  For  the  most  part,  research  evidence  is consistent  with  these  predictions;  however,  for most  tasks,  it  has  also  been  shown  there  is  some decrement in performance when a highly demanding secondary task is introduced. Therefore, it may not be the case that automatic processes are completely  resource  free;  rather,  automaticity  may  be best characterized by a reduction in the processing resources required.

Another  important  prediction  of  skill  acquisition  and  automaticity  theories  concerns  pressure-induced  failures  of  performance  (choking  under pressure). One of the dominant theories of choking,  called  explicit  monitoring  theory,  proposes that pressure can cause the deautomization of well-learned  skills.  This  occurs  because  an  increase  in self-consciousness  and  anxiety  about  performing well causes an athlete to turn attention inward on the specific processes of performance in an attempt to  exert  more  explicit  monitoring  and  control. This increase in skill-focused attention is thought to disrupt the automatic motor procedures.

References:

  1. Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  2. Beilock, S. L., & Gray, R. (2007). Why do athletes “choke” under pressure? In G. Tenenbaum & R. C. Eklund (Eds.), Handbook of sport psychology (3rd ed., pp. 425–444). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
  3. Fitts, P. M., & Posner, M. I. (1967). Human performance. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.

See also:

  • Sports Psychology
  • Perception in Sport

Understanding Automatic Processes: Streamlining Everyday Tasks for Efficiency

In today’s fast-paced world, finding ways to streamline everyday tasks is crucial for enhancing productivity and overall efficiency. Automatic processes, often powered by technology, offer a solution that allows individuals and organizations to minimize repetitive work and focus on more strategic activities. By understanding how these processes function—ranging from simple automation tools to advanced AI systems—people can transform their daily routines, reduce errors, and free up valuable time. This article delves into the various aspects of automatic processes, exploring their benefits, applications, and practical tips for integrating them into your life for a more efficient day-to-day experience.

Automatic Processes Definition

Automatic processes are unconscious practices that happen quickly, do not require attention, and cannot be avoided.

Automatic Processes Analysis

Imagine you are driving a very familiar route, such as your daily route to school, the university, or your work. You mindlessly drive along various familiar roads and upon arrival, a friend asks you, “Did you see there’s a new DVD/video store on the square near the church?” You did pass this square, as you always do, but you didn’t notice the new store, and you answer, “Oh, I was thinking about our upcoming exam, I didn’t even see the square, let alone the new store.”

From a psychological viewpoint, something very interesting happened here. How can you drive safely and negotiate traffic without consciously noticing where you are? Let’s face it (just remember the first few times you drove a car), driving is really quite complicated. You have to carefully look at the road, at the traffic, and in your rearview mirror. You have to slow down in time before a curve, you have to steer, if you are driving a stick shift, you have to change gears. In addition, you have to do all these things more or less simultaneously. How can you do all of those things while thinking about your exam, that is, without any conscious attention directed at the driving?

The answer is that driving (assuming you are skilled and the route is familiar) is a largely automatic process. Of course you saw the square when you passed it; otherwise you could not have negotiated it. You cannot drive blindfolded. However, the process of driving through the square is so automatized that a fleeting glance of the square is enough. You do not need to pay conscious attention, and you do not have to interrupt thinking about the exam. In fact, if you drive a familiar route, you usually pay attention only to things that are unexpected. And those are the only things you later remember (“I did notice there was an accident on Main Street”).

The Four Horsemen of Automaticity

In the 1970s, psychologists started to distinguish between psychological processes that were automatic and psychological processes that were controlled. Automatic processes are unconscious (i.e., you are not consciously aware of them), efficient (they require no effort), unintentional (you don’t have to want them to happen), and uncontrollable (once started, you cannot stop them). Controlled processes are the opposite: They are conscious (you have to be consciously aware of them), inefficient (they require effort), intentional (they only happen when you want them to happen), and controllable (you can stop them).

Soon thereafter, psychologists discovered a problem. According to the criteria outlined in the previous paragraph, relatively few psychological processes are fully automatic and even fewer are fully controlled. There are exceptions of course. If an object (such as a snowball) quickly approaches your face, you close your eyes. This is a reflex and it is fully automatic. It does not require conscious awareness, it does not require any effort, it is unintentional, and also uncontrollable (you cannot stop it). Conversely, writing is fully controlled. You need to be aware of it, it requires effort, it is intentional and controllable. However, most interesting psychological processes have both automatic and controlled elements. Think again about driving. If you are a skilled driver driving a familiar route, driving can be mostly unconscious (except when something unexpected happens). It is also highly efficient as you can easily have an interesting conversation with someone while you drive—that is, the driving does not require effort. However, it is intentional. You do not suddenly find yourself driving somewhere. You drive to school or work because you want to go there. Finally, driving is controllable. You can stop the process if you so desire.

As a consequence, according to the psychologist John Bargh, it would be more useful to look at the separate criteria for automaticity (Bargh called them the four horsemen), rather than viewing automaticity and control as all or none concepts.

1. Conscious versus unconscious.

Some behavior requires conscious attention; other behavior does not and can proceed unconsciously. Obviously, most bodily functions, such as breathing, do not require conscious awareness. However, many psychological processes are unconscious as well. For instance, we automatically categorize objects or people we perceive as good or bad. That is, we possess the capacity of “automatic evaluation.” Investigating whether processes require conscious awareness can be done in different ways. The technique used most often in social psychological research is priming. Psychologists surreptitiously present people with stimuli (such as words or pictures). When these stimuli have psychological consequences (such as when a primed stimulus influences an impression formed of a person later on) without people being aware of this influence, psychologists can conclude it is an unconscious process.

2. Efficient versus inefficient.

Some behavior requires effort and uses what is called “attentional resources.” Other behavior does not. The driving example is useful again. The first few times you drive a car, you need attentional resources to control the car and to navigate traffic. Once you are a skilled driver, however, you do not need attentional resources anymore. The way to investigate whether a process is efficient or not is to have people do it while also performing a secondary task that requires attentional resources (such as memorizing digits or talking). If a process breaks down while one engages in a secondary task, the process is inefficient. If not, it is efficient. A skilled driver can have an interesting conversation with a passenger while driving, because driving has become efficient. A starting driver cannot drive and talk at the same time without running the risk of causing dangerous situations, because driving is still inefficient.

3. Intentional versus unintentional.

Some behavior only happens when we want it to happen, whereas other behavior unfolds regardless of our desires. Driving is intentional, and so are behaviors such as reading or writing. However, some of the behavior we display during social interactions is unintentional. It has been found that people, without being aware of it, to some extent mimic their interaction partner. If we talk to someone, we often use the same gestures, our bodily postures match, and even our speech patterns converge a little bit. This does not happen because we want it to happen; rather, it is unintentional. One way to find out whether a process is intentional is to see whether it occurs when it has negative consequences. Priming research shows that priming people with a social stereotype leads to behavioral assimilation. For instance, if people are primed with pictures of senior citizens, they become a little slower and more forgetful; if people are primed with professors, they perform better on a general knowledge test. These effects also hold for behaviors that are clearly negative. Priming people with supermodels makes them perform worse on a general knowledge test. This means the effect is unintentional, as no one deliberately wants to come across as stupid.

4. Controllable versus uncontrollable.

This criterion is relatively simple. Can people stop a psychological process after it has started? If it is stoppable, it is called controllable. Closing your eye when a snowball is about to hit you is uncontrollable. Breathing is too. You can hold your breath for a short while, but not for too long. Reading and talking are controllable. You can stop whenever you want to. Investigating the controllability of a process is relatively easy. See if people can stop an activity when you ask them to. If so, the process is controllable. If not, the process is uncontrollable.

Automaticity Is Adaptive

There are basically two kinds of automatic processes. Some things, such as reflexes, are automatic simply because of the way humans developed as a species. Other behavior is initially largely controlled (in the sense that it requires conscious awareness and effort) and can become automatic through learning. Driving is again a good example. Another is people’s morning routine. Many people think about the day ahead while they take a shower. This is possible because taking a shower is a routine, automatic process. It is efficient, so that we can use attentional resources to do more important things, such as planning our day. This is highly adaptive: The more we can do automatically, the more time we have left for the behaviors that do require conscious awareness and effort.

References:

  1. Bargh, J. A., & Chartrand, T. L. (1999). The unbearable automaticity of being. American Psychologist, 54, 462-476.
  2. Wilson, T. D. (2002). Strangers to ourselves: Discovering the adaptive unconscious. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Autobiographical Narratives: The Art of Telling Your Own Story

In a world saturated with curated lives and social media personas, the power of autobiographical narratives stands out as a profound means of self-expression and connection. These stories, woven from the threads of personal experiences, emotions, and reflections, offer a unique lens through which we can understand not only ourselves but also the complex tapestry of human existence. This article delves into the art of telling your own story, exploring the techniques, significance, and transformative power of sharing one’s life journey. Whether seeking catharsis, inspiration, or a deeper understanding of identity, the act of narrating our own lives can be both a profound and liberating endeavor. Join us as we uncover what it means to craft an autobiographical narrative and how it can resonate with others in meaningful ways.

Autobiographical Narratives Definition

Autobiographical narratives are the stories people remember (and often tell) about events in their lives. Some autobiographical narratives refer to memories of important personal events, like “my first date” or “the day my father died.” Others may seem trivial, like a memory of yesterday’s breakfast. Many psychologists study the extent to which memories of personal events are accurate. They ask questions like these: How true is the memory? Is the story a distortion of what really happened? Other psychologists are interested in what autobiographical narratives say about a person’s self-understanding or about social life and social relationships more generally. Their questions include these: What does a particular memory mean for the person remembering it? How do people use autobiographical narratives in daily life?

What Do We Remember?

People’s memory of personal events is not like a video recording that can simply be played back. For one thing, people eventually forget most of the events that occur to them. Try to remember what you ate for lunch on June 1, 2005. Or what you wore the day before that. Clearly, the brain has more important things to do than remember every event that has ever occurred. Second, the details of those events people do recall, even when they recall them vividly, often turn out to be inaccurate and mixed up, especially as those events fade into the distant past. At the same time, research suggests that while people often make errors in recalling the details of important personal events from long ago, their narrative accounts are surprisingly accurate in conveying the overall gist of those events. People remember the big picture better than they do the small facts.

Many psychologists see autobiographical memory as an active and creative process. People construct memories by (a) attending to certain features of a to-be-remembered event, (b) storing information about that event according to personally meaningful categories and past experiences, (c) retrieving event information in ways that help solve social problems or meet situational demands, and (d) translating the memory of the event into a coherent story. What people attend to, how they store autobiographical information, what they eventually retrieve from their memory, and how this all gets told to other people are all influenced by many different factors in the person’s life and social world, including especially a person’s goals. For example, a person whose life goal is to become a physician may have constructed especially vivid personal memories of interacting with doctors and nurses growing up, positive experiences with biology and the health sciences, and episodes of helping other people. Autobiographical narratives provide a ready supply of episodic information that people may consult in making important decisions about the future.

Autobiographical Narratives Development and Functions

Most people can recall virtually nothing from before the age of 2 years. Autobiographical memory begins to manifest itself in the third and fourth year of life as young children begin to form simple memories about events that have happened to them. Parents, siblings, and teachers often provide considerable assistance in the development of early autobiographical memory. They will ask young children to recall recent events (yesterday’s trip to the park, Sarah’s birthday party) and encourage them to relate the event as a story. By the age of 5, most children are able to tell coherent stories about events in their lives, complete with setting, characters, plot, and a sense of beginning, middle, and end. As children move through elementary school, their autobiographical memories become more complex and nuanced.

In adolescence and young adulthood, people begin to organize memories of particular personal events into larger, integrative life stories. These internalized and developing life stories may serve as expressions of narrative identity. In other words, people’s life stories— their autobiographical understandings of their lives as a whole—help to provide their lives with meaning and direction, explaining in story form how they believe they came to be who they are today and where they believe their life may be headed in the future. Life stories continue to develop as people move through their adulthood years, reflecting new experiences and challenges as well as their ever-changing understanding of the past. An adult’s life story may contain many key scenes, such as especially important early memories, high points, low points, and turning points. While these important scenes may originate from almost any point in the life span, research shows that people tend to have an especially large number of emotionally vivid autobiographical recollections from their late-adolescent and early-adult years—memories of events that took place between the ages of about 15 and 25.

People often share their stories of important personal events with friends and acquaintances. Personal storytelling, therefore, often promotes interpersonal intimacy. Parents often tell their children stories from their own past, teachers often employ autobiographical narratives to promote learning in the classroom, and many adults see personal narratives as effective vehicles for socialization and imparting moral lessons for young people. The stories people tell about their own lives, furthermore, reflect the values and norms of their culture. For example, research suggests that American children tend to develop more elaborate personal memories than do Japanese and Chinese children, arguably reflecting a Western emphasis on the full expression of the individual self (over and against an East Asian emphasis on the collective). Stories are shaped by social class and gender: Working-class people prefer certain kinds of stories about the self while upper-middle-class people may prefer others; women and men are expected to tell different stories about their lives. In important ways, autobiographical memories reflect what has actually happened in a person’s life. But they are also strongly shaped by a person’s values and goals; the people with whom, and the occasions wherein, personal stories are told; and the broad forces of social class, gender, religion, society, and culture.

References:

  1. McAdams, D. P. (2001). The psychology of life stories. Review of General Psychology, 5, 100-122.
  2. Thorne, A. (2000). Personal memory telling and personality development. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 45-56.

Read More:

  • Social Psychology Research Methods

Auto-Motive Innovations: Driving the Future of Transportation

As we stand on the brink of a new era in transportation, the automotive industry is undergoing a transformative shift fueled by innovation and technological advancements. From electric vehicles that promise to reduce our carbon footprint to autonomous driving systems that redefine mobility, the landscape of personal and public transport is changing rapidly. This article explores the cutting-edge developments that are not only enhancing vehicle performance and efficiency but also reshaping our cities and the way we travel. Join us as we delve into the exciting innovations that are driving the future of transportation and paving the way for a more sustainable and connected world.

Auto-Motive Model Definition

The auto-motive model as proposed by John Bargh in 1990 describes the complete sequence of goal pursuit— that is, reaching a goal—as a process taking place outside of conscious awareness and control. The term motive is chosen to encompass goals, motives, and values, yet in most cases, research has focused on goals used in a broad sense. The auto-motive model complements self-regulatory models that focus more on the role of conscious goal choice. According to the automotive model, a strong mental link is supposed to develop between goals that individuals chronically pursue and cognitive representations of situations. Thus, due to consistent and repeated pairing, goals are automatically activated given a goal-relevant, so-called critical situation. As a consequence, these automatically activated goals direct behavior without intentional or deliberate involvement of the individual. In turn, reflective choice and other controlled influences on behavior can be bypassed.

In other words, goals are supposed to be represented in the mind in the same way as stereotypes, schemata, and other social constructs and their activation potential are understood to function in a similar manner. Therefore, they can also be automatically activated by situational features. Procedures and plans to attain the respective goal thus influence subsequent behavior, judgments, and decisions outside of the conscious control of the individual. As an example, a student holding an academic achievement goal returns to campus after a break. Being on campus activates the goal, and the student’s behavior now turns more toward studying than parties.

Auto-Motive Model History and Background

Research on perception up to the 1940s considered perception mainly to be a transformation process. Since the “new look” approach after World War II— numerous studies have shown that consciously and unconsciously activated goals of an individual shape the way this person perceives the environment and how this information is interpreted and remembered. The auto-motive model draws on this motivational principle of perceptual readiness (i.e., more attentional resources are given to context information in line with a current activated goal), yet takes the development of the “new look” research toward cognitive approaches into account. Under this later “new look” perspective, schemata, or stereotypes, were understood to function in a way similar to goals and values in the early days of the “new look.” The model introduced by Bargh bridges the two, motivational and cognitive, perspectives by proposing that much human behavior is guided by goals automatically activated through situational features, similar to cognitive activation effects (e.g., stereotypes). Central to the auto-motive model is the assumption that the situational cues for these motives rest in the unconscious as well.

Automatic Response Activation According to the Auto-Motive Model

The actual auto-motive model is quite complex and describes several paths for automatic responses to environmental features to occur. In general, automatic goal activation can happen by means of three different routes. First, situational features can activate goals and motives if a consistent pairing preexists between the situational cues and the goal. The activated goals and motives are idiosyncratic in their character, that is, specific to the individual in his or her chronic attainment. Second, situational features can directly activate socially shared norms beyond an idiosyncratic level. In other words, strong normative goals are being activated, too. The third route includes other individuals one is interacting with in the given situation. Thus, the activation does not depend on the situational setting alone, but on the goals and intentions of the interaction partners as well. In this case, perceived goal representations of the interaction partner are being activated. Given these three pathways, the subsequent steps toward behavior are quite different. Within the first route, situational cues lead to an activation of an individual goal: Either goal-relevant procedures or plans are activated. Plans lead to automatic response behavior, whereas procedures influence judgments and decisions. Within the second route, a more global normative activation results in plans that again activate response behavior. For the third path, the route to response behavior is a little more complex because it includes cognition about a third person. The activation of the goal representation of an interaction partner leads to an activation of personal, rather individual reactive goals. It is these goals that activate goal-related plans, which in turn activate corresponding behavior. The reason why the third path is comparatively more complex than the first two is due to the fact that while one can assume an automatic link between environmental features and situational representation, behavioral information of others is much more ambiguous relative to the perceived goal of the interaction partner. Put differently, the individual goal activation depends on the accessibility and applicability of the different possible goals of the interaction partner. Once this perceived goal has been defined, one’s own response goal is assumed to be activated immediately. This response goal activation is flexible and is dependent on the most accessible and best applicable perceived goal representation.

As one can easily see, the model encompasses three distinct routes to judgmental or behavioral responses. Depending on the features of the social environment, one of these automatic paths is being utilized.

Empirical Evidence for Auto-Motive Model

The auto-motive model—as described in the previous section—cannot be tested in its full extent, nor is it designed to be tested, as one would expect from a theory. Yet there are many research questions that have been influenced and instigated by the auto-motive model, and research addressing them has provided abundant evidence for each of the three paths to automatic behavior. Above and beyond the general influence of goals on perception, there is evidence for auto-motives in person and group judgment and in interpersonal interaction.

The influence of auto-motives on perception can be tied nicely to early work in the “new look.” It was shown that words describing values participants had previously indicated to hold were recognized faster than words irrelevant to participants’ goals and values. More recent research revealed, for example, that individuals who can be labeled as chronic egalitarians recognized words relevant to egalitarianism faster, if they were preceded by a goal-relevant stimulus. In the case of this particular experiment, pictures of African Americans and Caucasians were used as stimuli of which only the pictures of African Americans automatically triggered the chronic goal of egalitarianism for the respective individuals. These participants then showed lower response latencies to relevant target words. In line with the auto-motive model, a specific context activated a chronic goal (i.e., egalitarianism). Given this activation, these goals facilitate what an individual is more ready to perceive and what not.

But auto-motives also function beyond perceptual readiness; they can also influence how people judge other people or nonsocial objects. The body of research in this field is vast, and there is substantial converging evidence. Certain instrumental values or standards not only filter what people perceive in the world around them, they also determine people’s interpretation of it. On a more general societal level, goals and values can be embedded in the structure of stratified societies. To sustain this social structure, impressions and social judgments are made in line with the prevailing maintenance goal for the social dominance stratification to which individuals adhere.

Auto-motives also influence interpersonal interaction in very peculiar ways. So far, automatic goal activation within the auto-motive model has been understood to result from context cues and information paired with chronic goals. Recently, evidence has been found for goal activation by human beings close to the individual actor, for example, by a parent or a partner. If, for example, an academic achievement goal is linked to fulfilling the wish of one’s father, then the activation of the mental representation of the father can activate the related achievement goal. Another auto-motive is the so-called chameleon effect describing mimicry behavior. This nonconscious imitation is especially pronounced for individuals with a strong perspective-taking ability (i.e., being able to understand the ideas, perceptions, and feelings of another person). For them, interaction partners serve as triggers for their chronic perspective taking, which in turn leads to automatic and uncontrolled imitation behavior (e.g., rubbing your nose or shaking you foot). However, interpersonal relationships do not always have to be characterized by imitation. An intimacy versus an identity goal that is chronically accessible for an individual determines how this person approaches interpersonal relationships, either as a means for interdependence and mutual responsibility or as a constant source for self-verification and establishment of an individual identity.

In sum, the research described in this entry provides sufficient evidence supporting the auto-motive model. It is clear that aspects of detail may be subject to alternative interpretations, but overall the auto-motive model provides a sound background for research describing automatic responses to the environment. It has fused early research on motivated perceptual readiness with later approaches addressing more cognitive activation effects into one comprehensive model with the central tenet that goal activation and response behavior activation can happen unconsciously given a chronic association of the goal with a set of perceived environmental features.

References:

  1. Bargh, J. A., & Chartrand, T. L. (2000). The mind in the middle: A practical guide to priming and automaticity research. In H. T. Reis (Ed.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 253-285). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  2. Moskowitz, G. B. (2005). Social cognition: Understanding self and others. New York: Guilford Press.
  3. Wyer, R. S., Jr. (Ed.). (1997). The automaticity of everyday life. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Understanding Autism/Asperger’s Syndrome: Navigating the Journey Together

Autism and Asperger’s Syndrome represent a spectrum of neurological differences that shape the way individuals perceive and interact with the world around them. As awareness of these conditions continues to grow, so too does the need for understanding and support. This article aims to shed light on the unique challenges and strengths associated with autism and Asperger’s, offering insights and practical strategies for individuals, families, and communities. By fostering empathy and knowledge, we can navigate this journey together, creating a more inclusive environment that celebrates neurodiversity.

According to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR), the formal diagnostic category for autism and Asperger’s syndrome is pervasive developmental disorder, or PDD. Pervasive developmental disorders include autistic disorder, Rett’s disorder, Asperger’s disorder (syndrome), childhood disintegrative disorder, and pervasive developmental disorder-not otherwise specified (PDD-NOS). Mental health professionals, however, often refer to each of these disorders as autism spectrum disorders (ASD), which better conveys the continuum of types and severity of symptoms delineated by this diagnostic label.

The Autism Spectrum Disorders

The first accurate description of autistic symptoms appeared in 1943, when Leo Kanner published “Autistic Disturbances of Affective Contact.” The term autism, a derivative of the Greek word autos or self, highlighted the primary symptom exhibited by the 11 children in Kanner’s study. Kanner noted that these children presented with marked deficits in their ability to relate to other people.

Over time, the conceptualization of autism has evolved into the current view of a spectrum of psychological disorders identified by a fundamental deficit in one’s ability to navigate the social world. Autistic disorder and Asperger’s disorder, for example, share a common symptom in a significant impairment in social functioning relative to the individual’s chronological age and measured intelligence.

The key distinguishing criteria for autistic disorder is a marked impairment in language, cognitive, or adaptive development before age 3. While some persons with autistic disorder are “high-functioning” (HFA), it is not uncommon for someone with autism to have severe language, emotional, and cognitive delays— including mental retardation. A classically autistic individual presents with early communication and language delays, cognitive deficits, stereotyped and restricted interests and behaviors, and a profound lack of social awareness. Stereotyped and restricted interests may include a specialized interest in a certain area or subject such as electrical wiring or computers. Stereotyped behaviors are often exhibited as repetitive hand, finger, or whole-body movements aimed at providing increased self-stimulation. These are referred to as self-stimulatory behaviors or “stimming” and should be distinguished from the motor tics that are typically observed in anxiety disorders.

A year after Kanner published his findings on autism, Hans Asperger, an Austrian pediatrician, published a paper discussing four boys who presented with symptoms similar to those described by Kanner. Asperger, however, described children that were higher-functioning in terms of developmental history than those described by Kanner.

Similar to autistic disorder, persons with Asperger’s disorder present with social difficulties that pervade their ability to establish and maintain peer relationships. Moreover, they exhibit highly specialized areas of interests and are often referred to as being “experts” on that subject. A person with Asperger’s disorder, however, is differentiated from a person with autism in that the individual does not have a history of significant cognitive, adaptive, or language delays.

While individuals with Asperger’s disorder do not have a history of communication delays, they, like persons with autistic disorder, present with peculiar linguistic tendencies, including a pedantic style, awkward tone and rate (often referred to as “robotic”), and difficulties maintaining reciprocal, give-and-take conversations. Moreover, they often avoid using idioms and figures of speech because they struggle to separate the literal meaning of these expressions from the underlying expressive connotation.

Etiology

Researchers continue to struggle to identify specific causes of autism. Research strongly suggests, however, that autism may be a heritable disorder. With increased funding and support for autism research, scientists can continue to explore the genetic epidemiology of the disorder and other possible causes.

Diagnosis

Autism spectrum disorders are formally diagnosed through a comprehensive psychological evaluation of the individual conducted by a qualified professional, such as a licensed psychologist. A thorough assessment should begin with a clinical interview that explores developmental history and current social, emotional, behavioral, and cognitive functioning. The clinician then administers standardized global assessment questionnaires that measure social, emotional, and cognitive functioning. Other standardized questionnaires and assessment tools that are specific to ASD are also administered, such as the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule. It is important to include a behavioral observation of the individual in an unstructured social setting.

Treatment

Once a diagnosis is made, treatment recommendations can then be individualized to the individual’s specific diagnosis and needs. Researchers agree, however, that early intervention for persons with ASD is essential and can significantly improve an individual’s level of functioning.

Current research indicates that lower-functioning individuals with autistic disorder benefit from intense behavioral therapy, such as applied behavioral analysis (ABA) and verbal behavior analysis (VB), to improve functional communication skills, adaptive skills, and behavior. ABA utilizes the principles of behavioral psychology and pairs repeated trials with a positive rein-forcer to modify inappropriate behaviors by improving receptive language skills. VB also uses behavior modification techniques but emphasizes the functionality of expressive language skills. Another effective program, treatment, and education of autistic and communication handicapped children (TEACCH), uses an amalgamation of therapeutic techniques and methods to address the specific needs of each individual.

Persons with ASD often report significant problems relating to others and establishing peer relationships; thus a key component of treatment is an intensive focus aimed at improving the individual’s social skills. It is common for persons with ASD to present with social skills deficits, including difficulties establishing and maintaining reciprocal conversations, an inability to understand nonverbal social cues (e.g., facial expressions), problems communicating to others through nonverbal language (e.g., using appropriate eye contact to modulate a social interaction), and inadequately processing or a complete lack of awareness of others’ emotions. Thus, social skills training for AS focuses on topics ranging from conversational skills to personal space.

Although there are many techniques and programs designed for persons with ASD, there is no one-size-fits-all approach to treatment. Given the variability of symptoms and the frequency of comorbid disorders, it is common for clinicians to take a multidisciplinary approach in treating the disorder. Treatment teams might include licensed psychologists, occupational therapists, speech and language pathologists, medical professionals, teachers, and physical therapists.

Changes and Challenges

The autism spectrum disorders continue to be a mental health issue of intense interest for clinicians, researchers, and politicians. Increased federal funds for further research on autism and Asperger’s disorder have led to an expansion of information and resources available to both parents and clinicians. Given the heterogeneity of ASD symptoms, a large portion of these funds are allocated to improving diagnostic procedures, such as refining current assessment tools and their ability to identify persons with ASD. Moreover, the importance of early and intensive intervention as well as effective treatment across the life span have continued to be the foci of research.

References:

  1. American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., Text rev.). Washington, DC: Author.
  2. Asperger, H. (1944). Die “Autistischen Psychopathen” im Kindesalter. Archiv fur Psychiatrie und Nervenkrankheiten, 117, 76-136.
  3. Attwood, T. (2000). Strategies for improving the social integration of children with Asperger syndrome. Autism, 4, 85-100.
  4. Green, G. (1996). Early behavioral interventions for autism: What does the research tell us? In C. Maurice, G. Green, & S. C. Luce (Eds.), Behavioral intervention for young children with autism: A manual for parents and professionals (pp. 29-13). Austin: Pro-Ed.
  5. Kanner, L. (1943). Autistic disturbances of affective contact. Nervous Child, 2, 217-250.
  6. Kanner, L. (1971). Follow-up study of eleven autistic children originally reported in 1943. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 1, 119-145.
  7. Krasny, L., Williams, B., Provencal, S., & Ozonoff, S. (2003). Social skills interventions for the autism spectrum: Essential ingredients and model curriculum. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 12, 107-122.
  8. Lovaas, O. I. (1981). Teaching developmentally disabled children: The ME book. Austin: Pro-Ed.
  9. Lovaas, O. I. (1987). Behavioral treatment and normal educational and intellectual functioning in young autistic children. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 3-9.
  10. Mesibov, G. B. Shea, V., & Schopler, E. (2005). The TEACCH approach to Autism spectrum disorders. New York: Springer.
  11. Painter, K. K. (2006). Social skills groups for children and adolescents with Asperger’s Syndrome. London: Jessica Kingsley.
  12. Sundberg, M. L, & Michael, J. (2001). The benefits of Skinner’s analysis of verbal behavior for children with autism. Behavior Modification, 25, 698-724.
  13. Sundberg, M. L., Michael, J., & Partington, J. W. (1998). Teaching language to children with autism or other developmental disabilities. Pleasant Hill, CA: Behavior Analysts, Inc.
  14. Sundberg, M. L., Michael, J., Partington, J. W., & Sundberg, C. A. (1996). The role of automatic reinforcement in early language acquisition. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 13, 21-37.
  15. Szatmari, P., Jones, M. B., Zwaigenbaum, L., & MacLean, J. E. (1998). Genetics of autism: Overview and new directions. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 28, 351-368.

See also:

  • Counseling Psychology
  • Mental Status Examination

Understanding Autism Spectrum Disorders: A Guide for Families and Caregivers

As awareness of Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD) continues to grow, so does the need for accurate information and support for families and caregivers navigating this complex landscape. Understanding ASD is crucial not only for fostering acceptance and inclusion but also for empowering those affected by it. This guide aims to demystify the spectrum, providing valuable insights into the characteristics, challenges, and strengths associated with autism. Whether you are a parent, relative, or friend of someone with ASD, this article will equip you with the knowledge and resources to better support your loved ones and advocate for their needs.

Offers a comprehensive exploration of this complex neurodevelopmental condition. Beginning with an introduction that defines Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD) and outlines their historical context and prevalence, the article delves into an understanding of the condition, covering the core symptoms, etiological factors, and neurobiological underpinnings. It then shifts to the critical aspects of diagnosis and assessment, addressing the importance of early screening and diagnosis, assessment strategies, and the prevalence of co-occurring conditions. The interventions and support section discusses evidence-based approaches, family and social support, and the role of educational settings. Finally, the article concludes by summarizing key insights and highlighting the dynamic nature of autism research and the significance of early intervention and ongoing support in the context of ASD. This comprehensive overview serves as a valuable resource for those seeking a deeper understanding of Autism Spectrum Disorders.

Introduction

Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD) encompass a complex and heterogeneous group of neurodevelopmental conditions characterized by a range of challenges in social communication and behavior. ASD is defined by a triad of core symptoms: deficits in social interaction, impairments in communication, and the presence of repetitive and restricted patterns of behavior. This introductory section provides a foundational understanding of ASD by defining its key characteristics and offering an overview of the condition.

ASD is a condition that has garnered increasing attention in recent decades, and its prevalence has risen significantly. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), approximately 1 in 44 children in the United States are now diagnosed with ASD. This section also explores the historical context of autism, tracing its recognition and understanding from early descriptions to contemporary diagnostic criteria.

The purpose of this article is to provide a comprehensive overview of Autism Spectrum Disorders, covering various aspects, including the definition, prevalence, etiology, diagnosis, interventions, and support mechanisms. By examining these components, the article aims to offer a detailed understanding of ASD, facilitating improved awareness and informed decision-making for individuals, families, educators, and practitioners working with individuals on the autism spectrum. It serves as a valuable resource for those interested in the science, practice, and the evolving landscape of autism research and treatment.

Understanding Autism Spectrum Disorders

Disorders (ASD) are characterized by a distinctive set of core symptoms that underlie the diagnosis and understanding of the condition. The diagnostic criteria for ASD, as outlined in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5), include persistent deficits in social communication and social interaction, coupled with restricted, repetitive patterns of behavior, interests, or activities. Individuals with ASD may exhibit challenges in understanding and responding to social cues, such as nonverbal communication, empathy, and the nuances of peer interactions. These difficulties often result in social isolation and atypical communication patterns. Additionally, the presence of repetitive behaviors, such as hand-flapping, echolalia, or intense preoccupations, further characterizes ASD. It’s important to recognize that within the spectrum, there exists considerable variability in the severity and presentation of these symptoms. While some individuals with ASD may have significant impairments in all areas of functioning, others may have milder symptoms and achieve higher levels of social and communication competence. This intrinsic variability highlights the need for individualized assessment and intervention strategies to accommodate the diverse needs of those on the autism spectrum.

The etiology of ASD is multifaceted and continues to be an area of active research. Genetic and environmental factors play essential roles in its development. Research has consistently demonstrated a strong hereditary component in ASD. Family and twin studies have revealed a higher risk of ASD in first-degree relatives of individuals with the condition, suggesting a strong genetic predisposition. However, while multiple genes are implicated in ASD, no single gene is solely responsible for its manifestation. Environmental factors, such as prenatal exposures to toxins and infections, have also been associated with increased risk.

Current research on causative factors seeks to unravel the intricate interplay between genetics and the environment. Epigenetics, for instance, explores how environmental factors can influence gene expression and contribute to the development of ASD. Understanding these factors is essential for early detection and intervention, as well as for potential future preventive measures.

A substantial body of research has focused on unraveling the neurobiological underpinnings of ASD. Neuroimaging studies have provided insights into the structural and functional differences in the brains of individuals with ASD. These studies have identified atypical patterns of connectivity and neural development, particularly in brain regions associated with social cognition and communication, such as the amygdala and the prefrontal cortex.

Several theories of neurodevelopmental origins have emerged. The “intense world theory” suggests that individuals with ASD may experience the world as overly intense and overwhelming, leading to their characteristic sensory sensitivities and avoidance behaviors. The “mirror neuron system theory” posits that dysfunction in mirror neurons, which are involved in imitating and understanding the actions and emotions of others, may underlie social and communication deficits in ASD.

In this section, we have introduced the core characteristics of ASD, discussed the variability within the spectrum, examined the genetic and environmental factors contributing to its etiology, and explored theories related to the neurobiological underpinnings of the condition. These insights provide a foundation for the subsequent sections, which delve into the diagnosis and assessment, interventions, and support mechanisms for individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorders.

Autism Spectrum Disorders Diagnosis and Assessment

Early screening and diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD) are crucial for timely intervention and support. The importance of early detection cannot be overstated, as research has consistently demonstrated that early intervention can significantly improve outcomes for individuals with ASD. Early diagnosis allows for the implementation of tailored interventions and support services, which can help address core deficits in social communication and behavior. Diagnostic tools and criteria, as established by the DSM-5, are designed to assist healthcare professionals and diagnosticians in identifying ASD. These criteria include a thorough evaluation of the individual’s social and communicative behaviors, as well as the presence of repetitive and restricted patterns of behavior. Timely identification can lead to early access to interventions that promote language development, social skills, and adaptive behavior, ultimately improving the quality of life for individuals on the autism spectrum.

Assessing and evaluating individuals with ASD requires a comprehensive and multidisciplinary approach. Comprehensive assessment strategies encompass a range of methods and tools to gain a thorough understanding of the individual’s strengths and challenges. This includes structured observations, standardized assessments, interviews with caregivers, and in some cases, neurodevelopmental assessments. Assessments often explore areas such as language and communication abilities, cognitive functioning, adaptive behavior, sensory sensitivities, and the presence of co-occurring conditions. Given the heterogeneity within the autism spectrum, these evaluations are essential for developing individualized intervention plans that address the unique needs of each person with ASD.

A multidisciplinary approach is particularly valuable in assessing individuals with ASD. A team of professionals, including psychologists, speech and language therapists, occupational therapists, and behavioral specialists, may collaborate to provide a comprehensive assessment. This approach allows for a holistic understanding of the individual’s abilities and challenges, ensuring that no aspect of their development goes unaddressed. Such evaluations serve as the basis for developing effective treatment plans and interventions tailored to the specific needs of each individual on the autism spectrum.

It is not uncommon for individuals with ASD to experience co-occurring conditions, which can complicate diagnosis and treatment planning. Common comorbidities in individuals with ASD include attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), anxiety disorders, and sensory processing difficulties. These co-occurring conditions can significantly impact the individual’s daily life, making it essential to identify and address them as part of the diagnostic and treatment process. Recognizing and managing these conditions can enhance the effectiveness of interventions and improve the overall well-being of individuals with ASD.

The presence of co-occurring conditions highlights the need for a comprehensive, individualized approach to assessment and intervention. Healthcare professionals and specialists must consider not only the core symptoms of ASD but also any accompanying conditions when developing treatment plans. A holistic understanding of the individual’s unique profile, including their strengths and challenges, is key to providing the best possible support and improving their quality of life.

This section has emphasized the significance of early screening and diagnosis, comprehensive assessment strategies, and the importance of addressing co-occurring conditions in individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorders. These foundational elements provide the basis for the subsequent sections, which explore evidence-based interventions and support mechanisms for individuals on the autism spectrum.

Interventions and Support

Interventions for individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD) are diverse and tailored to address their unique needs. Evidence-based interventions are crucial in providing the most effective support. These interventions encompass various approaches, including behavioral and educational interventions, speech and language therapy, and occupational and physical therapy.

Behavioral and Educational Interventions: Behavioral interventions, such as Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA), have been widely used to target specific behaviors and skills. ABA breaks down complex behaviors into manageable components and uses positive reinforcement to promote desired behaviors. Educational interventions focus on developing academic and social skills in structured and supportive environments. These interventions are often individualized to address the specific needs and goals of the individual with ASD.

Speech and Language Therapy: Communication challenges are a hallmark of ASD. Speech and language therapy, provided by trained speech-language pathologists, aims to improve communication skills, including speech, language comprehension, and social communication. Augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) systems may also be utilized for non-verbal individuals.

Occupational and Physical Therapy: Individuals with ASD may exhibit sensory sensitivities and motor coordination difficulties. Occupational therapy addresses sensory integration and daily living skills, while physical therapy focuses on improving gross and fine motor skills. These therapies can enhance an individual’s overall functioning and independence.

The involvement of families and access to social support are fundamental components of effective intervention for individuals with ASD. Families play a central role in the lives of those with ASD, and their active engagement can greatly impact the success of interventions.

Importance of Family Involvement: Family involvement is vital as it ensures that interventions and support strategies extend beyond clinical settings and into the daily lives of individuals with ASD. Families can learn to implement behavioral techniques, support communication development, and provide a consistent and supportive environment. Their understanding and advocacy can help individuals with ASD thrive.

Support Services and Community Resources: Beyond the family unit, a network of support services and community resources is essential. These may include support groups for parents and caregivers, respite care services to alleviate the demands on families, and community programs designed to promote social interaction and skill development for individuals with ASD. Government and non-profit organizations often provide valuable resources and information for families seeking assistance.

Educational settings for individuals with ASD should be carefully considered to meet their unique needs and optimize their learning and social development.

Inclusive Education and Special Education Programs: Inclusive education aims to integrate individuals with ASD into regular classrooms alongside typically developing peers. Special education programs, on the other hand, offer more individualized support and tailored curricula for those with more significant challenges. The choice between these settings depends on the individual’s needs and abilities and is often a collaborative decision made by parents, educators, and specialists.

Individualized Education Plans (IEPs): In many cases, individuals with ASD will have Individualized Education Plans (IEPs) that outline their specific educational goals and the support services required to achieve them. These plans are developed collaboratively between parents, educators, and specialists, and they provide a roadmap for the individual’s educational journey. IEPs ensure that educational settings and interventions are personalized to the needs of the student.

In this section, we have discussed evidence-based interventions, the importance of family and social support, and the various educational settings and plans available for individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorders. These components are essential for optimizing the development and well-being of individuals on the autism spectrum and are pivotal in providing them with the best opportunities for a fulfilling life.

Conclusion

In this comprehensive article, we have delved into the multifaceted world of Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD), from understanding its core characteristics to the critical aspects of diagnosis, interventions, and support mechanisms. As we conclude, it is essential to recap key points, emphasize the evolving landscape of autism research and treatment, and underscore the importance of early intervention and ongoing support for individuals with ASD.

Throughout the article, we have learned that ASD encompasses a range of core symptoms, including deficits in social communication and the presence of repetitive and restricted patterns of behavior. We explored the variability within the spectrum, acknowledging that no two individuals with ASD are exactly alike, highlighting the necessity for individualized approaches to assessment and intervention.

Etiologically, we have seen that genetics and environmental factors play intertwined roles in the development of ASD, with research continuing to uncover new insights into their complex interplay. The examination of neurobiological underpinnings has revealed atypical brain structures and functions, driving various theories of neurodevelopmental origins.

The diagnostic process involves early screening and comprehensive assessment, with a multidisciplinary approach to provide a holistic view of the individual’s abilities and challenges. The presence of co-occurring conditions further underscores the need for comprehensive assessment and individualized interventions.

In the realm of interventions and support, we have discussed evidence-based approaches, including behavioral and educational interventions, speech and language therapy, and occupational and physical therapy. The pivotal role of families and the availability of support services and community resources in the lives of individuals with ASD cannot be overstated. Educational settings, whether inclusive or specialized, cater to the unique needs of individuals with ASD, often guided by Individualized Education Plans (IEPs).

As we look to the future, the landscape of autism research and treatment continues to evolve. Advances in genetics, neuroscience, and behavioral sciences hold promise for a deeper understanding of ASD and the development of more effective interventions. Emerging technologies and innovative approaches are reshaping the ways we support and empower individuals on the autism spectrum, improving their quality of life.

In conclusion, early intervention and ongoing support are paramount in ensuring that individuals with ASD reach their full potential. The journey of understanding and supporting those with Autism Spectrum Disorders is ongoing, and as knowledge continues to grow, so too does the potential for enhancing the lives of individuals on the autism spectrum. This article serves as a valuable resource for those seeking to navigate this complex and dynamic landscape, providing a foundation for informed decision-making and meaningful support for individuals with ASD.

References:

  1. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). American Psychiatric Publishing.
  2. Baio, J. (2018). Prevalence of autism spectrum disorder among children aged 8 years—autism and developmental disabilities monitoring network, 11 sites, United States, 2016. MMWR Surveillance Summaries, 67(6), 1-23.
  3. Dawson, G., & Bernier, R. (2013). A quarter century of progress on the early detection and treatment of autism spectrum disorder. Development and Psychopathology, 25(4 Pt 2), 1455-1472.
  4. Lord, C., Elsabbagh, M., Baird, G., & Veenstra‐Vanderweele, J. (2018). Autism spectrum disorder. The Lancet, 392(10146), 508-520.
  5. Ozonoff, S., & Iosif, A. M. (2019). Changing conceptualizations of regression: What prospective studies reveal about the onset of autism spectrum disorder. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 100, 296-304.
  6. Zwaigenbaum, L., Penner, M., & Barton, M. (2018). The emotional development of infants with autism. Autism Spectrum Disorders: Advances in Research, 5-6.
  7. Neale, B. M., Kou, Y., Liu, L., Ma’ayan, A., Samocha, K. E., Sabo, A., … & Daly, M. J. (2012). Patterns and rates of exonic de novo mutations in autism spectrum disorders. Nature, 485(7397), 242-245.
  8. National Autism Center. (2015). Findings and conclusions: National standards project, phase 2. Randolph, MA: National Autism Center.
  9. Schreibman, L., Dawson, G., Stahmer, A. C., Landa, R., Rogers, S. J., McGee, G. G., … & McGee, G. (2015). Naturalistic developmental behavioral interventions: Empirically validated treatments for autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45(8), 2411-2428.
  10. Vivanti, G., & Rogers, S. J. (2014). Autism and the mirror neuron system: Insights from learning and teaching. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 369(1644), 20130184.
  11. Weitlauf, A. S., McPheeters, M. L., Peters, B., Sathe, N., Travis, R., Aiello, R., … & Warren, Z. (2014). Therapies for children with autism spectrum disorder: Behavioral interventions update. Comparative Effectiveness Review No. 137. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
  12. Lai, M. C., Lombardo, M. V., & Baron-Cohen, S. (2014). Autism. The Lancet, 383(9920), 896-910.
  13. Warren, Z. E., Veenstra, S., Weas, S., Swain, D. M., & Sathe, N. A. (2011). Evidence-based assessment of autism spectrum disorders in children and adolescents. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 40(1), 99-125.
  14. Dawson, G., Jones, E. J. H., Merkle, K., Venema, K., Lowy, R., Faja, S., … & Webb, S. J. (2012). Early behavioral intervention is associated with normalized brain activity in young children with autism. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 51(11), 1150-1159.
  15. Rubenstein, E., Wiggins, L. D., Lee, L. C., & Billioux, A. (2015). Developmental disabilities and behavioral problems in children with autism spectrum disorder: Special needs for a special population. Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics, 36(3), 166-175.

Authoritarian Personality: Understanding the Traits and Impacts on Society

In an era where societal polarization and political extremism seem to be on the rise, the concept of the authoritarian personality offers valuable insights into human behavior and its far-reaching implications. This psychological framework, first articulated in the mid-20th century, explores a distinctive set of traits often associated with individuals who exhibit a preference for order, authority, and conformity over diversity and dissent. Understanding these characteristics not only sheds light on individual motivations but also reveals how such personalities can shape group dynamics, influence political landscapes, and impact broader societal norms. As we delve into the traits of the authoritarian personality and their consequences, we can better grasp the underlying psychological mechanisms driving contemporary social and political phenomena.

Authoritarian Personality Definition

The authoritarian personality describes a type of person who prefers a social system with a strong ruler— the authoritarian person is comfortable being the strong ruler but if the individual is not the strong ruler then he or she will demonstrate complete obedience to another strong authority figure. In both cases, there is little tolerance toward nonconservative ways of thinking. People whose personalities are structured in the manner of an authoritarian personality tend to conform to authority and believe that complete obedience to rules and regulations is completely necessary; any deviation from rules is to be treated harshly. The authoritarian personality often results in people harboring antagonistic feelings towards minority groups, whether religious, ethnic, or otherwise.

Authoritarian Personality History and Development

The history of research on the authoritarian personality stems largely from the end of the Second World War and the Holocaust. During the 1950s, one prevailing fear was the potential spread of anti-democratic ideologies as had been seen by the rapid spread of Nazi fascism. The origin of racism and prejudice was an important topic in the academic world because of the mass genocide of the Jews. Scientists also realized that prejudice and anti-democratic ideologies—and fascism in particular—were not characteristic of any specific group, which meant that they began looking for another theory to explain these phenomena.

Concerns over the potential rise of fascism led to a search for a theory to identify those who were susceptible to anti-democratic ideologies. Theodor Adorno, a sociologist, is credited with the theory of authoritarian personality, which addressed the need for an explanation of prejudice and racism. Adorno believed that a certain personality structure was common among people who may fall victim to anti-democratic ideology. Adorno and his colleagues characterized the authoritarian personality structure on nine dimensions, discussed in the following section.

One implication of the theory that a personality structure causes this susceptibility is that the prejudice or racism is a product mostly of the people believing it, and not of the actual target. More specifically, anti-Semitism would not have much to do with the characteristics of Jewish people, but rather the characteristics of the people who dislike the Jews.

The authoritarian personality is thought to emerge from childhood experiences. This reasoning comes from Sigmund Freud’s psychoanalytic theory. Freud suggested that childhood experiences, especially those with parents, lead to people’s attitudes as adults. For example, if children have a very strict authoritarian parent, they will learn to suppress thoughts, feelings, and actions which might be considered immoral (e.g., aggression or sex drive). Later, because the child learned not to act on certain urges, the urges are projected onto other “weaker” people, often minorities. This results in the negative attitudes that authoritarian people carry regarding other groups. Again, the projection of internal suppressed urges onto others suggests that the prejudice is due to the individual’s personality, not to traits of the oppressed group.

Though the term authoritarian personality implies a dominating or controlling personality, in theory a person with an authoritarian personality can actually prefer to be obedient to a clear authority figure. This type of personality desires strict adherence to rules and sees a clear distinction between the weak and the strong. Authoritarian personalities are somewhat conflicted because they want power, but also are very willing to submit to authority.

Despite Adorno’s efforts to separate right-wing conservatism from authoritarian personality, Robert Altemeyer’s later version of authoritarian personality was almost synonymous with right-wing conservatism. Altemeyer’s take on authoritarian personality included only three of Adorno’s nine dimensions associated with authoritarian personality: conventionalism, authoritarian aggression, and authoritarian submission. Recently, a book by John Dean critically discussed conservatism (and the Republican Party) from the right-wing authoritarian personality viewpoint put forth by Altemeyer.

The first research on authoritarian personality was, for the reasons mentioned above, very politically driven. While the overarching goal was to explain racism and prejudice, the research direction boiled down to trying to predict who would be susceptible to anti-democratic ideas by measuring personality traits.

Three scales that were assumed to be indicative of authoritarian personality (the anti-Semitism, ethnocentrism, and political economic conservatism scale) were used to measure the general agreement with an antidemocratic or fascist viewpoint. Adorno and his colleagues sought to further understand the personality structure and developed a scale, the F-scale, which was meant to measure “implicit antidemocratic tendencies and fascist potential.” The scale’s more general purpose was to show the underlying structure of an authoritarian personality and to predict potential for conforming to fascism and anti-democratic ideology. The F-scale is made up of questions relating to nine aspects: conventionalism, authoritarian submission, authoritarian aggression, anti-intraception, superstition and stereotypy, power and “toughness,” destructiveness and cynicism, projectivity, and sex.

Each of the aspects of the scale is meant to tap a different part of the authoritarian personality. Conventionalism questions get at how strongly one believes in middle-class values. Fascism was thought to originate in the middle class and potential fascists would then score high on conventionalism. Those who are very willing to submit to authority and desire strong leaders would score high on authoritarian submission questions. High ratings on the authoritarian aggression questions reflect attitudes that imply dislike toward minority groups and the belief that deviations from authority deserve severe punishment. It was thought that a person high in authoritarian aggression had probably had a strict childhood, preventing him or her to indulge in few desires, which led to this person projecting his or her frustration onto other people who participated in “morally unsound” practices. Anti-intraception is a characteristic of the authoritarian personality which results in a low tolerance for creative thinking and emotion-importance; people who are anti-intraceptive (i.e., are not particularly self-aware) reject subjective thinking in favor of more concrete thinking (e.g., placing high importance on clearly observable facts instead of thoughts and feelings). Superstition and stereotypy show the extent to which a person feels that his or her fate depends mostly on external forces and that he or she cannot personally influence outcomes of situations. A strong belief in two types of people (e.g., strong and weak) will be reflected in power and toughness questions. Authoritarian personalities prefer strong leaders who can maintain order by severe punishment of those who deviate. The destructiveness and cynicism variable again addresses the authoritarian personality’s aggression, but this time the aggression is not based on morality. The idea here is that people with authoritarian personalities harbor aggression and are just waiting for an opportunity to act on it. The projection items on the F-scale are used to tap subjects’ repressed urges (which were mentioned in relation to authoritarian aggression) by asking them about the negative attributes of others. For example, an anti-Semite’s view that Jews are hostile may actually reflect his or her own repressed hostility projected onto someone else. Finally, the sex items on the F-scale also deals with the suppression of urges, namely sexual. Because authoritarian personalities suppress their sexuality (they see it as immoral), their attitudes toward people who engage in these acts is especially negative.

Since the creation of the F-scale, its validity (i.e., ability to actually predict what it claims to predict) has been called into question on numerous occasions, and on numerous occasions has failed these validity tests. It has also failed to predict right-wing authoritarianism, as many left-wing group members can score high on the test. However, the F-scale has shown some correlations, or relationships, to other constructs such as superstition and “old-fashioned” values. Another suggestion has been that the F-scale reflects narrow-mindedness.

Overall, scientists have abandoned the use of the F-scale to study prejudice and racism today. If the scale merely reflects values from the early 1900s or superstitious beliefs, it is not very useful for identifying and predicting racist attitudes. Many of the scale’s questions do mirror the cultural environment of the 1920s and 1930s, but this does not necessarily imply that these values are strongly related to potential for fascist behavior. Also, the idea that racism exists because of alternative attitudes of a few people is not very plausible. Rather, scientists now believe that racism and prejudice result largely from group membership attitudes that reside in all humans. Research on prejudice and racism now tend to take a group approach, instead of studying the personalities of people individually. Political researchers, on the other hand, still make use of authoritarian personality, but generally use Altemeyer’s right-wing authoritarianism in place of Adorno’s original construct.

References:

  1. Adorno, T. W. (1950). The authoritarian personality. New York: Harper.
  2. Altemeyer, B. (1988). Enemies of freedom: Understanding right-wing authoritarianism. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  3. Dean, J. (2006). Conservatives without conscience. New York: Viking Press.
  4. Martin, J. L. (2001). The authoritarian personality, 50 years later: What questions are there for political psychology? Political Psychology 22(1), 1-26.

Understanding Authoritarian Parenting Style: Key Characteristics and Effects

Authoritarian parenting is a distinctive approach characterized by high demands and low responsiveness, often leading to a strict and controlling environment for children. In this article, we will explore the key characteristics of this parenting style, including its emphasis on obedience, discipline, and a lack of warmth. Additionally, we will examine the potential effects on children’s emotional, social, and cognitive development, shedding light on how this rigid framework can influence their behavior and relationships in adulthood. Understanding authoritarian parenting is crucial for parents, educators, and mental health professionals alike, as it allows for a more informed perspective on fostering positive development in children.

Authoritarian style is one of the three original parenting styles Diana Baumrind recognized. In describing parenting styles, Baumrind identified two dimensions of parenting. The first relates to how demanding parents are. This element speaks to parents’ levels of strictness or supervision. The other dimension Baumrind acknowledged relates to how responsive parents are. In other words, highly responsive parents are ones who are accepting of and warm toward their children.

Parents who are strict and demanding yet rarely accepting and responsive are categorized as having an authoritarian parenting style. These parents often lack flexibility and offer less give-and-take or compromising with their children. On the opposite end of the spectrum is permissive parenting style, which incorporates a highly accepting technique but also lacks supervision. Authoritarian and permissive parenting styles generally are less desirable than authoritative  parenting  style,  which  utilizes  a  warm  but firm technique in parent–child relationships. Although Baumrind initially described only three parenting styles, some literature describes a fourth commonly recognized style labeled neglectful. Neglectful parents are those who provide neither supervision nor acceptance.

Authoritarian parents tend to expect and value obedience. They have clear and rigid rules designed to limit their children’s freedom. They do not tolerate defiance, and they may employ strict punishment for rule breaking. Instead of teaching their children to make logical decisions, they teach their children to do what they say. In a sense, they want their children to be blank slates.

Although authoritarian parenting often elicits obedience from young children, research shows that several less desirable outcomes can occur when the children reach adolescence. For example, adolescents of authoritarian parents might be anxious and withdrawn because of the fear of their parents. Girls might become overly dependent on others, whereas boys might react aggressively to others. To express dislike of authoritarian parenting style, these adolescents may also enter a period of rebellion in which they learn to believe misbehavior is not wrong as long as their parents do not find out about it. This strategy hinders communication between the parents and children and undermines the importance of moral reasoning.

However, although the authoritarian parenting style paves a road to some undesirable outcomes, other correlates of authoritarian parenting style are constructive. Studies show that children of authoritarian parents have lower levels of drug or alcohol abuse than do children of permissive or neglectful parents. In addition, these children usually do fairly well academically in their later school years. This case is especially  true  for  children  from Asian American families, which tend to adopt a more authoritarian style and also tend to have high regard for academic excellence. Nonetheless, with the exception of Asian American adolescents from authoritarian homes, academic performance of adolescents in authoritarian homes usually falls a bit short of the scholastic achievement of adolescents in authoritative homes. Authoritarian parenting styles can be, but are not always, the most advantageous for the scholastic realm.

Although authoritarian parenting style has the ability to engender both positive and negative outcomes for children, research indicates that authoritative parenting is the most beneficial style for the welfare of children and for achieving rewarding parent-child relationships. This indication is especially true in societies that value change and independence. Authoritarian parenting styles work best in societies such as agrarian-industrial societies that place value on accepting one mapped-out way of achieving goals.

Summary

Some studies have argued that parenting style influences children’s levels of happiness, assertiveness, independence, and aggression even more than attachment style. Clearly, parenting style has an instrumental role in children’s development. Individuals’ parenting styles often resemble their personalities and therefore typically remain in the same category over time. However, if parents are aware of the positive effects of practicing a combination of warmth and firmness, they might be more inclined to attempt incorporating some authoritative techniques into their parenting styles and therefore increase the likelihood of healthy development for their children.

References:

  1. Baumrind, D. (1967). Child care practices anteceding three patterns of preschool behavior. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 75, 43–88.
  2. Baumrind, (1971). Current patterns of parental authority. Developmental Psychology Monograph, 4(1), part 2.
  3. Baumrind, (1991). The influence of parenting style on adolescent competence and substance use. Journal of Early Adolescence, 11, 5695.
  4. Dinwiddie, (n.d.). Effective parenting styles: Why yesterday’s models won’t work today. Retrieved from http:// www.kidsource.com/better.world.press/parenting.html
  5. Edwards, (n.d.). Parenting styles. Retrieved from http://www.unt.edu/cpe/module1/blk2styl.htm
  6. Maccoby,   E.,  &  Martin,  J. A.  (1983).  Socialization  in the context of the family. In E. M. Hetherington (Ed.), Handbook of psychology: Vol. 4. Socialization, personality, and social development (pp. 1–101). New York: Wiley.
  7. Steinberg, L., Dornbusch, S., & Brown, B. (1992). Ethnic differences in adolescent achievement: An ecological perspectiv American Psychologist, 47, 723–729.

Scroll to Top